Large cities • 2022 • past ranking

Statutární město Brno

IČO 44992785

Buyer divides contracts into lots to foster participation of SME's Considerable volume of contracts goes only to few firms.

17.
ranking
73%
zIndex

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

41%
average 51%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
I/42 Brno VMO Tomkovo náměstí a I/42 Brno VMO Rokytova
Construction work
3
Ø4 in industry
I/42 Brno, VMO Žabovřeská I - etapa II
Construction work for highways
2
Ø4 in industry
Prodloužení TT z Osové ke Kampusu MU v Bohunicích
Railway construction works
2
Ø2 in industry
Nábřeží řeky Svratky - Realizace protipovodňových opatření města Brna - etapy VII a VIII
Engineering services
3
Ø2 in industry
Dostavba kanalizace v Brně II. - výběr zhotovitele dostavby kanalizace
Construction, foundation and surface works for highways, roads
2
Ø6 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

80%
average 91%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
FIRESTA-Fišer, rekonstrukce, stavby a.s.
12 2,273,190,993
OHLA ŽS, a.s.
8 2,268,590,221
Metrostav a.s.
4 872,151,214
HOCHTIEF CZ a.s.
3 717,984,280
Metrostav DIZ s.r.o.
2 713,509,626
Other suppliers 1,852 13,184,973,022

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

59%
average 41%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 18% (19 from 103)
Nonprice competition 21% (60 from 291)
Division into lots 12% (36 from 291)
E-auction 0% (1 from 291)
Innovative procedure 4% (11 from 291)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

67%
average 66%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 13,944,176,831
Small scale tenders 2,797,981,877
Unregulated purchases 20,091,973,917
Total 36,834,132,624

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

76%
average 79%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Nákup akcií společnosti Technologický Park Brno, a.s.
Technical exclusivity
- 541,946,652
I/42 Brno, VMO Žabovřeská I - etapa II
Contract modification
2,034,998,130 138,069,020 (+7%)
I/42 Brno VMO Tomkovo náměstí a I/42 Brno VMO Rokytova
Contract modification
2,356,252,993 44,201,641 (+2%)
Dostavba kanalizace v Brně II. - výběr zhotovitele dostavby kanalizace
Contract modification
1,097,032,448 41,275,173 (+4%)
Brno, Solniční I, Česká II, Opletalova - rekonstrukce kanalizace a vodovodu
Contract modification
89,949,500 13,542,711 (+16%)

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

52%
average 56%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 4%
Cancelled contracts 5%
Average requirements modifications count 1.40
Average decision length 109.77 days

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 100%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 303)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 303)
Missing buyer ID 0% (1 from 303)
Missing call for tenders 0% (1 from 303)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 303)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (1 from 303)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

69%
average 69%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 80% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.10 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 279 tenders under the law)
0-250K 502 tenders
250K-500K 155 tenders
500K-1000K 232 tenders
1000K+ 481 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

87%
average 86%

Buyer did receive excellent feedback from its tender participants.