Small cities • 2022 • past ranking

Město Pohořelice

IČO 00283509

Enough firms are competing for contracts. Buyer does not use tools to support competition.

88.
ranking
72%
zIndex

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

68%
average 51%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
INSTALACE VZT ROZVODŮ A REKUPERAČNÍCH JEDNOTEK II
Cooling and ventilation equipment
4
Ø3 in industry
CHODNÍKY A ZPEVNĚNÉ PLOCHY V OBCI SMOLÍN
Paths and other metalled surfaces
15
Ø4 in industry
ZPRACOVÁNÍ A PROJEDNÁNÍ PROJEKTOVÉ DOKUMENTACE NA ZHOTOVENÍ STAVBY MŠ POHOŘLICE A VÝKON AUTORSKÉHO DOZORU
Architectural, construction, engineering and inspection services
4
Ø3 in industry
SLUŽEBNA MĚSTSKÉ POLICIE
Construction work for commercial buildings, warehouses and industrial buildings, buildings relating to transport
7
Ø4 in industry
SBĚRNÝ DVŮR POHOŘELICE
Construction work
5
Ø4 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

96%
average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
SET - stavby s.r.o.
2 15,731,071
Odštěpný závod GreMi KLIMA, s.r.o.
1 12,512,000
RONYTRANS, s.r.o.
1 9,722,323
Arch.Design, s.r.o.
1 9,440,000
STAMA GROUP s.r.o.
1 9,090,751
Other suppliers 28 113,607,869

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

11%
average 27%

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

68%
average 68%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 290,300,641
Small scale tenders 12,960,426
Unregulated purchases 357,483,266
Total 660,744,333

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

98%
average 87%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
SVČ POHOŘELICE UČEBNY ZÁJMOVÉHO A NEFORMÁLNÍHO VZDĚLÁVÁNÍ
Contract modification
4,882,284 625,242 (+13%)

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

60%
average 60%
Average values displayed

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 98%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 23)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 23)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 23)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 23)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 23)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 23)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

36%
average 49%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 78% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.57 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 23 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 3 tenders
500K-1000K 2 tenders
1000K+ 3 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

80%
average 81%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.