Small cities • 2022 • past ranking

Město Vítkov

IČO 00300870

The competition for contracts is low. Buyer does not support competition by using e-auctions, lots or extended deadlines.

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

30%
average 51%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Silnice III/4429 - rekonstrukce mostu ev. č. 4429-1 přes potok Čermná v obci Vítkov
Buyer profile data - no industry specification
1
Ø2 in industry
Technická infrastruktura pro výstavbu RD - lokalita Těchanovická, Vítkov
Construction, foundation and surface works for highways, roads
6
Ø6 in industry
Cyklostezka Vítkov Prostřední Dvůr
Cycle path construction work
10
Ø5 in industry
Nákup cisternové automobilové stříkačky pro Město Vítkov
Water-tender vehicles
2
Ø1 in industry
Revitalizace sportovního areálu ZŠaG Vítkov
Buyer profile data - no industry specification
1
Ø2 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

90%
average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
FIRESTA - Fišer, rekonstrukce, stavby a.s.
1 32,520,908
Pražská plynárenská, a.s.
2 29,126,000
CONTE spol. s r.o.
1 16,610,628
KARETA s.r.o.
1 12,470,643
COLAS CZ, a.s.
1 6,123,182
Other suppliers 16 117,295,109

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

11%
average 27%

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

75%
average 68%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 105,787,024
Small scale tenders 67,386,565
Unregulated purchases 134,314,855
Total 307,488,444

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

97%
average 87%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Cyklostezka Vítkov Prostřední Dvůr
Contract modification
6,123,182 646,277 (+11%)

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

60%
average 60%
Average values displayed

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

88%
average 98%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 12)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 12)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 12)
Missing call for tenders 8% (1 from 12)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 12)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 12)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

38%
average 49%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 82% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.27 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 11 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 1 tender
500K-1000K 1 tender
1000K+ 9 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

80%
average 81%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.