Large cities • 2022 • past ranking

Statutární město Jablonec nad Nisou

IČO 00262340

Court found serious misconduct. Large volume of money is spent without open competition.

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

57%
average 51%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Zajištění dopravní obslužnosti veřejnou linkovou dopravou v oblasti Jablonecka v letech 2023 - 2028
Public road transport services
6
Ø3 in industry
Nakládání s komunálními odpady ve městě Jablonec nad Nisou
Refuse and waste related services
1
Ø1 in industry
JUDO aréna v Jablonci nad Nisou
Construction work for buildings relating to leisure, sports, culture, lodging and restaurants
3
Ø4 in industry
Navýšení kapacity MŠ Montessori v Jablonci nad Nisou
Construction work for kindergarten buildings
8
Ø5 in industry
Dešťová kanalizace Jablonec CENTRUM – I. etapa, Jablonec nad Nisou
Sewer construction work
5
Ø6 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

95%
average 91%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
ČSAD Slaný a.s.
1 376,511,910
Severočeské komunální služby s.r.o.
3 187,525,358
UMBRELLA Coach & Buses s.r.o.
1 163,234,400
TERMIL s.r.o.
3 83,981,008
ŠEBESTA VHS, v.o.s.
4 73,302,688
Other suppliers 117 1,015,222,617

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

45%
average 41%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 18% (3 from 17)
Nonprice competition 5% (2 from 37)
Division into lots 11% (4 from 37)
E-auction 5% (2 from 37)
Innovative procedure 3% (1 from 37)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

81%
average 66%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 1,418,983,885
Small scale tenders 134,609,771
Unregulated purchases 841,914,251
Total 2,395,507,906

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

49%
average 79%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Výzva k jednání pro přímé zadání smlouvy o veřejných službách v přepravě cestujících v oblasti Jablonecko na přechodné období do 2 let
Emergency
- 163,234,400
JUDO aréna v Jablonci nad Nisou
Contract modification
31,479,407 5,806,570 (+19%)
Navýšení kapacity MŠ Montessori v Jablonci nad Nisou
Contract modification
29,343,783 2,553,672 (+9%)
Rekonstrukce světelně řízené křižovatky ul. Palackého v Jablonci nad Nisou
Contract modification
14,237,981 641,468 (+5%)
Modernizace ZŠ Liberecká v Jablonci nad Nisou – dodávka nábytku do odborných učeben
Contract modification
3,720,800 258,970 (+7%)

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

61%
average 56%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 19%
Average requirements modifications count 0.88
Average decision length 65.40 days

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 100%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 40)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 40)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 40)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 40)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 40)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 2% (1 from 40)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

72%
average 69%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 98% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.28 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 40 tenders under the law)
0-250K 10 tenders
250K-500K 22 tenders
500K-1000K 22 tenders
1000K+ 32 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

80%
average 86%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.