Large cities • 2022 • past ranking

Statutární město Zlín

IČO 00283924

Buyer profile has high number of errors. SUPPLIER_FEEDBACK_TRUE_1

16.
ranking
74%
zIndex

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

57%
average 51%

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

86%
average 91%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
KKS, spol. s r.o.
9 235,490,389
STRABAG a.s.
3 124,254,341
SMO a.s.
5 100,220,814
Pražská plynárenská, a.s.
2 83,884,045
JASY Vsetín s.r.o.
16 67,729,442
Other suppliers 243 1,229,140,492

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

39%
average 41%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 6% (2 from 31)
Nonprice competition 19% (21 from 109)
Division into lots 6% (6 from 109)
E-auction 1% (1 from 109)
Innovative procedure 4% (4 from 109)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

67%
average 66%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 1,296,976,144
Small scale tenders 290,617,656
Unregulated purchases 1,914,480,854
Total 3,502,074,654

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

79%
average 79%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Propagace statutárního města Zlína prostřednictvím ledního hokeje
Authorship rights
- 13,192,911
Propagace statutárního města Zlína prostřednictvím ledního hokeje
Authorship rights
- 13,192,911
Propagace statutárního města Zlína
Authorship rights
- 13,150,000
Propagace statutárního města Zlína prostřednictvím fotbalu
Authorship rights
- 4,958,678
Renovace výplní otvorů budovy Zlínský zámek
Contract modification
12,948,953 3,848,639 (+30%)

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

61%
average 56%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 6%
Cancelled contracts 21%
Average requirements modifications count 1.03
Average decision length 76.13 days

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 100%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 122)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 122)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 122)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 122)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 122)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 122)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

48%
average 69%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 94% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.98 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 114 tenders under the law)
0-250K 5 tenders
250K-500K 14 tenders
500K-1000K 38 tenders
1000K+ 68 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

100%
average 86%

Buyer did receive excellent feedback from its tender participants.