Good buyer. Buyer profile is in relatively good shape. Buyer divides contracts into lots to foster participation of SME's
Is the level of competition satisfactory? detailed info
Largest contracts Industry |
Bids |
---|---|
Sportovní hala Nové Město na Moravě
Multi-purpose sports facilities construction work |
1
Ø4 in industry |
Rekonstrukce ul. Lesní, Nové Město na Moravě
Works for complete or part construction and civil engineering work |
4
Ø4 in industry |
Rekonstrukce ul. Tyršova, Nové Město na Moravě
Construction work for water and sewage pipelines |
1
Ø5 in industry |
Rekonstrukce ul. Drobného, Nové Město na Moravě, úsek Smetanova- Výhledy
Works for complete or part construction and civil engineering work |
2
Ø4 in industry |
Vybudování odborných učeben a modernizace stávajících učeben 1.ZŠ v Novém Městě na Moravě- vybavení interiéru
School furniture |
5
Ø1 in industry |
Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms? detailed info
Largest suppliers | Contracts count | Contracts volume Kč |
---|---|---|
STAREDO s.r.o. |
5 | 63,023,258 |
COLAS CZ, a.s. |
5 | 31,367,428 |
AQUASYS spol. s r.o. |
3 | 18,802,900 |
CENTROPOL ENERGY, a.s. |
2 | 16,248,640 |
SPH stavby s.r.o. |
1 | 15,074,466 |
Other suppliers | 157 | 238,142,927 |
Supplier | Contracts count | Contracts volume (Kč) |
---|---|---|
STAREDO s.r.o. |
5 | 63,023,258 |
COLAS CZ, a.s. |
5 | 31,367,428 |
AQUASYS spol. s r.o. |
3 | 18,802,900 |
CENTROPOL ENERGY, a.s. |
2 | 16,248,640 |
SPH stavby s.r.o. |
1 | 15,074,466 |
T O P SERVIS, s.r.o. |
1 | 8,648,615 |
CERGOMONT s.r.o. |
1 | 8,585,858 |
Pražská plynárenská, a.s. |
4 | 7,585,010 |
EP ENERGY TRADING, a.s. |
1 | 6,170,516 |
AGROCENTRUM ZS, s.r.o. |
1 | 4,897,000 |
Pavel Hodoval |
1 | 4,662,444 |
elitbau s.r.o. |
1 | 4,542,551 |
J.D.P. stavby s.r.o. |
1 | 4,279,741 |
THT Polička, s.r.o. |
1 | 4,126,000 |
MDS solution s. r. o. |
1 | 3,980,523 |
ZDAR, a.s. |
1 | 3,731,000 |
Dopravní Stavby Silnic s.r.o. |
2 | 3,497,256 |
Kooperativa pojišťovna, a.s., Vienna Insurance Group |
1 | 2,454,380 |
Slavia pojišťovna a.s. |
1 | 2,444,940 |
STAKO VYSOČINA s.r.o. |
2 | 2,187,430 |
Vodafone Czech Republic a.s. |
7 | 1,906,267 |
Milan Ječný |
6 | 1,724,758 |
TeS, spol. s r. o. Chotěboř |
1 | 1,689,534 |
CAMEA Technology, a.s. |
1 | 1,674,000 |
S A P. spol. s r.o. |
1 | 1,504,000 |
KANONA a.s. |
1 | 1,442,540 |
GMJ spol. s r.o. |
1 | 1,423,644 |
Tomáš Petr |
3 | 1,312,000 |
KB Stavební s.r.o. |
1 | 1,017,132 |
Z + M Partner, spol. s r.o. |
1 | 994,800 |
SVOBSTAV s.r.o. |
1 | 919,971 |
RESTART-STUDIO s.r.o. |
1 | 855,430 |
Auto Trutnov s.r.o. |
1 | 835,847 |
MEGATOP s.r.o. |
2 | 723,526 |
Envigest Pro,s.r.o. |
14 | 718,616 |
ENVIGEST, s.r.o. |
4 | 701,000 |
MŠ STAV s.r.o. |
1 | 675,463 |
STROMMY COMPANY s.r.o. |
1 | 641,873 |
Profil Plus s.r.o. |
1 | 631,058 |
ASFALTSERVIS s.r.o. |
4 | 592,400 |
GOZ GASTRO s.r.o. |
1 | 575,192 |
OFFICE-CENTRUM s.r.o. |
1 | 552,340 |
STINTER CZ s.r.o. |
1 | 551,425 |
AGOS stavební a.s. Pelhřimov |
1 | 537,182 |
PAPERA s.r.o. |
2 | 517,170 |
AUTOCONT a.s. |
1 | 494,596 |
CONTENUR Česká republika s.r.o. |
1 | 450,000 |
ING-FOREST s.r.o. |
1 | 439,294 |
Václav Polián |
1 | 433,000 |
Raamar, s.r.o. |
1 | 384,980 |
Petr Šustr |
1 | 360,760 |
STEJKR, spol. s r.o. |
1 | 350,514 |
ARCHUM architekti s.r.o. |
2 | 350,000 |
STAVOPLAST spol. s r.o. |
1 | 343,520 |
SASASTAV GROUP s.r.o. |
1 | 337,500 |
Jaromír Mareš |
2 | 335,300 |
KSB silniční práce spol.s.r.o. |
1 | 310,000 |
Ing. Martin Šolc |
8 | 305,900 |
BÜROPROFI s.r.o. |
1 | 261,966 |
SPEDOS ADS a.s. |
1 | 212,638 |
Ing. arch. Soňa Lahodová |
1 | 180,000 |
Window Holding a.s. |
1 | 162,436 |
CERGO ENERGY s.r.o. |
1 | 155,000 |
PREPO - TEAM s.r.o. |
14 | 126,547 |
Pavel Míka |
1 | 123,459 |
Ústav archeologické památkové péče Brno, veřejná výzkumná instituce |
10 | 106,000 |
Ing. Libor Bílek |
9 | 104,679 |
Ing. arch. Josef Knotek |
1 | 97,300 |
ha-vel internet s.r.o. |
6 | 97,153 |
MAJT s.r.o. |
1 | 91,977 |
Stanislav Pekárek |
1 | 81,636 |
PLASTIKOV, s.r.o. |
1 | 81,349 |
Bartoš Daniel |
1 | 51,000 |
Jan Líbal |
1 | 49,526 |
Oldřich Havlíček, DiS. |
1 | 48,048 |
O2 Czech Republic a.s. |
1 | 9,180 |
Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools? detailed info
Tool | Contracts count |
---|---|
Extended deadlines | 50% (2 from 4) |
Nonprice competition | 5% (1 from 20) |
Division into lots | 20% (4 from 20) |
E-auction | 0% (0 from 20) |
Innovative procedure | 5% (1 from 20) |
What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law? detailed info
Purchases | Volume (Kč) |
---|---|
Public procurement | 266,190,502 |
Small scale tenders | 77,425,324 |
Unregulated purchases | 445,233,424 |
Total | 788,849,250 |
Budget item | Objem prostredku Kč |
---|---|
Durable property purchases | 455,264,048 |
Material consumption | 16,605,748 |
Energy consumption | 17,065,270 |
Other consumption | 1,109,993 |
Sold goods | 7,800 |
Activation of durable property | 0 |
Activation of consumable property | 0 |
Change of stock | 1,599,014 |
Maintenance and repairs | 95,515,369 |
Travel costs | 449,737 |
Representation costs | 2,430,056 |
In-house services | 0 |
Other services | 177,116,310 |
Small long-term property costs | 16,514,851 |
Other costs | 5,171,053 |
Did buyer violate law significantly? detailed info
How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures? detailed info
Contract Reason for negotiated procedure without publication |
Original contract (Kč) | Contract modification / NPWP (Kč) |
---|---|---|
Sportovní hala Nové Město na Moravě Contract modification |
56,621,000 | 3,081,831 (+6%) |
Rekonstrukce ul. Drobného, Nové Město na Moravě, úsek Smetanova- Výhledy Contract modification |
10,735,300 | 1,486,163 (+14%) |
Parkovací místa a chodník na ul. Tyršova v Novém Městě na Moravě Contract modification |
7,595,932 | 921,853 (+13%) |
Rekonstrukce ul. Tyršova, Nové Město na Moravě Contract modification |
14,934,771 | 707,859 (+5%) |
Modernizace odborných učeben při 2. ZŠ Leandra Čecha v Novém Městě na Moravě-stavební část Contract modification |
1,017,132 | 125,442 (+13%) |
Contract Reason for negotiated procedure without publication |
Original contract (Kč) | Contract modification / NPWP (Kč) |
---|---|---|
Sportovní hala Nové Město na Moravě Contract modification |
56,621,000 | 3,081,831 (+6%) |
Rekonstrukce ul. Drobného, Nové Město na Moravě, úsek Smetanova- Výhledy Contract modification |
10,735,300 | 1,486,163 (+14%) |
Parkovací místa a chodník na ul. Tyršova v Novém Městě na Moravě Contract modification |
7,595,932 | 921,853 (+13%) |
Rekonstrukce ul. Tyršova, Nové Město na Moravě Contract modification |
14,934,771 | 707,859 (+5%) |
Modernizace odborných učeben při 2. ZŠ Leandra Čecha v Novém Městě na Moravě-stavební část Contract modification |
1,017,132 | 125,442 (+13%) |
Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications? detailed info
Does buyer publish vital data in official journal? detailed info
Type of flaw | Contracts count |
---|---|
Bidders count not published | 0% (0 from 25) |
Procedure type not published | 0% (0 from 25) |
Missing buyer ID | 0% (0 from 25) |
Missing call for tenders | 0% (0 from 25) |
Missing winning price | 0% (0 from 25) |
Contract modification by more than 50 % | 0% (0 from 25) |
Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements? detailed info
Check | Result | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? | 100% (contracts) | ||||||||||||
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? | 0.13 (average mistakes per contract) | ||||||||||||
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 24 tenders under the law) |
|
Contract | Type of flaw |
---|---|
Modernizace odborných učeben při 2. ZŠ Leandra Čecha v Novém Městě na Moravě-stavební část | Bid evaluation protocol missing |
Zajištění městské hromadné dopravy v Novém Městě na Moravě na období 2022-2023 | Price inconsistent with Journal |
Dodávka zemního plynu v rámci sdružených služeb dodávky zemního plynu na rok 2021 a 2022 | Payment information missing |
Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally? detailed info
Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.