Large cities • 2022 • past ranking

Statutární město Jihlava

IČO 00286010

Buyer profile has high number of errors. Competitions are open to multiple bidders.

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

42%
average 51%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Rozšíření trolejbusové dopravy Jihlava - sever
Building demolition and wrecking work and earthmoving work
2
Ø5 in industry
Obnova domu Masarykovo náměstí 21, Jihlava
Construction work
6
Ø4 in industry
U Mincovny 6 a 8, Jihlava – rekonstrukce
Construction work
6
Ø4 in industry
„Vybudování parkoviště P + R, ul. Žižkova, Jihlava“ a „Úprava křižovatky ul. Žižkova a Rantířovská“ – dokončení realizace stavby
Structures construction work
1
Ø4 in industry
Cyklostezka G04 ul. Mlýnská - Helenínská, Jihlava
Construction work
1
Ø4 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

92%
average 91%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Elektroline a.s.
1 129,898,386
POZEMNÍ STAVBY Jihlava, spol. s r.o.
4 101,089,631
prof. Ing. Josef Chybík, CSc.
2 67,564,600
Skanska a.s.
3 66,056,241
Pražská plynárenská, a.s.
7 59,588,435
Other suppliers 50 677,335,601

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

51%
average 41%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 18% (2 from 11)
Nonprice competition 20% (11 from 54)
Division into lots 2% (1 from 54)
E-auction 0% (0 from 54)
Innovative procedure 6% (3 from 54)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

58%
average 66%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 1,023,729,175
Small scale tenders 20,138,440
Unregulated purchases 2,045,095,678
Total 3,088,963,293

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

91%
average 79%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Cyklostezka G04 ul. Mlýnská - Helenínská, Jihlava
Contract modification
31,316,685 8,344,572 (+27%)
Zvýšení bezpečnosti dopravy v Jihlavě-II. etapa, Helenín-komunikace a vybudování chodníků v ul. Hálkova
Contract modification
11,127,848 4,532,979 (+41%)
Zvýšení bezpečnosti dopravy v Jihlavě - III. etapa - I. část - Rekonstrukce lávky pro pěší ve Starých Horách přes řeku Jihlavu, ev. č. 252d-Lp1
Contract modification
10,490,710 1,080,011 (+11%)
Dodávka tepelné energie do objektu MŠ Riegrova 21, Jihlava
Technical exclusivity
- 1,075,360
Veřejné sportoviště pro lední sporty v ul. Tyršova, Jihlava - Vybudování dočasného zázemí v suterénu objektu
Contract modification
23,756,708 1,008,845 (+5%)

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 100%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 61)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 61)
Missing buyer ID 2% (1 from 61)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 61)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 61)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 2% (1 from 61)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

28%
average 69%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 82% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.07 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 56 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 0 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

80%
average 86%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.