Buyer profile has high number of errors. Competitions are open to multiple bidders.
Is the level of competition satisfactory? detailed info
|
Largest contracts Industry |
Bids |
|---|---|
|
Rozšíření trolejbusové dopravy Jihlava - sever
Building demolition and wrecking work and earthmoving work |
2
Ø5 in industry |
|
Obnova domu Masarykovo náměstí 21, Jihlava
Construction work |
6
Ø4 in industry |
|
U Mincovny 6 a 8, Jihlava – rekonstrukce
Construction work |
6
Ø4 in industry |
|
„Vybudování parkoviště P + R, ul. Žižkova, Jihlava“ a „Úprava křižovatky ul. Žižkova a Rantířovská“ – dokončení realizace stavby
Structures construction work |
1
Ø4 in industry |
|
Cyklostezka G04 ul. Mlýnská - Helenínská, Jihlava
Construction work |
1
Ø4 in industry |
Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms? detailed info
| Largest suppliers | Contracts count | Contracts volume Kč |
|---|---|---|
|
Elektroline a.s. |
1 | 129,898,386 |
|
POZEMNÍ STAVBY Jihlava, spol. s r.o. |
4 | 101,089,631 |
|
prof. Ing. Josef Chybík, CSc. |
2 | 67,564,600 |
|
Skanska a.s. |
3 | 66,056,241 |
|
Pražská plynárenská, a.s. |
7 | 59,588,435 |
| Other suppliers | 50 | 677,335,601 |
| Supplier | Contracts count | Contracts volume (Kč) |
|---|---|---|
|
Elektroline a.s. |
1 | 129,898,386 |
|
POZEMNÍ STAVBY Jihlava, spol. s r.o. |
4 | 101,089,631 |
|
prof. Ing. Josef Chybík, CSc. |
2 | 67,564,600 |
|
Skanska a.s. |
3 | 66,056,241 |
|
Pražská plynárenská, a.s. |
7 | 59,588,435 |
|
PKS stavby a.s. |
1 | 45,597,247 |
|
PORR a.s. |
4 | 45,445,718 |
|
EUROVIA CS, a.s. |
1 | 33,390,586 |
|
Lumius, spol. s r.o. |
1 | 26,050,200 |
|
COLAS CZ, a.s. |
2 | 21,664,092 |
|
MCA atelier s.r.o. |
1 | 19,510,000 |
|
TERNI s.r.o. |
1 | 18,849,806 |
|
VHS Žďár nad Sázavou, spol. s r.o. |
2 | 16,592,406 |
|
KAVYL, spol. s r.o. |
1 | 14,978,992 |
|
SDZprofin, s.r.o. |
1 | 11,688,072 |
|
Vejtasa, s.r.o. |
1 | 11,127,848 |
|
SATES ČECHY s.r.o. |
2 | 10,790,841 |
|
PONVIA CONSTRUCT s.r.o. |
1 | 10,490,710 |
|
PK OSSENDORF s.r.o. |
1 | 10,100,000 |
|
EP ENERGY TRADING, a.s. |
1 | 8,940,300 |
|
JIHLAVSKÉ KOTELNY, s.r.o. |
2 | 8,909,200 |
|
PWB stavby s.r.o. |
1 | 8,437,349 |
|
Skládky VHS Jihlava s.r.o. |
1 | 7,195,843 |
|
DS-DRYWALL s.r.o. |
1 | 5,992,992 |
|
AutoCont CZ a.s. |
2 | 5,515,884 |
|
STORK střechy, s.r.o. |
2 | 5,363,225 |
|
Vodohospodářský rozvoj a výstavba a.s. |
1 | 3,888,000 |
|
VYSSPA Sports Technology s.r.o. |
1 | 3,808,901 |
|
C SYSTEM CZ a.s. |
1 | 3,249,500 |
|
PRAGOPROJEKT, a.s. |
1 | 2,865,000 |
|
CHYBIK+KRISTOF ASSOCIATED ARCHITECTS s.r.o. |
1 | 2,175,000 |
|
ELTODO OSVĚTLENÍ, s.r.o. |
1 | 1,984,837 |
|
NEXTCOMP, spol. s r.o. |
1 | 1,920,531 |
|
ARBYD CZ s.r.o. |
1 | 980,791 |
|
Ing.arch. David Balajka |
1 | 100,000 |
|
Rusina Frei, s.r.o. |
1 | 100,000 |
Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools? detailed info
| Tool | Contracts count |
|---|---|
| Extended deadlines | 18% (2 from 11) |
| Nonprice competition | 20% (11 from 54) |
| Division into lots | 2% (1 from 54) |
| E-auction | 0% (0 from 54) |
| Innovative procedure | 6% (3 from 54) |
What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law? detailed info
| Purchases | Volume (Kč) |
|---|---|
| Public procurement | 1,023,729,175 |
| Small scale tenders | 20,138,440 |
| Unregulated purchases | 2,045,095,678 |
| Total | 3,088,963,293 |
| Budget item | Objem prostredku Kč |
|---|---|
| Durable property purchases | 1,579,609,992 |
| Material consumption | 57,366,652 |
| Energy consumption | 60,673,322 |
| Other consumption | 0 |
| Sold goods | 1,940,418 |
| Activation of durable property | 0 |
| Activation of consumable property | 0 |
| Change of stock | 0 |
| Maintenance and repairs | 479,293,908 |
| Travel costs | 3,663,799 |
| Representation costs | 4,137,893 |
| In-house services | 0 |
| Other services | 827,578,904 |
| Small long-term property costs | 45,708,419 |
| Other costs | 28,989,985 |
Did buyer violate law significantly? detailed info
How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures? detailed info
|
Contract Reason for negotiated procedure without publication |
Original contract (Kč) | Contract modification / NPWP (Kč) |
|---|---|---|
|
Cyklostezka G04 ul. Mlýnská - Helenínská, Jihlava Contract modification |
31,316,685 | 8,344,572 (+27%) |
|
Zvýšení bezpečnosti dopravy v Jihlavě-II. etapa, Helenín-komunikace a vybudování chodníků v ul. Hálkova Contract modification |
11,127,848 | 4,532,979 (+41%) |
|
Zvýšení bezpečnosti dopravy v Jihlavě - III. etapa - I. část - Rekonstrukce lávky pro pěší ve Starých Horách přes řeku Jihlavu, ev. č. 252d-Lp1 Contract modification |
10,490,710 | 1,080,011 (+11%) |
|
Dodávka tepelné energie do objektu MŠ Riegrova 21, Jihlava Technical exclusivity |
- | 1,075,360 |
|
Veřejné sportoviště pro lední sporty v ul. Tyršova, Jihlava - Vybudování dočasného zázemí v suterénu objektu Contract modification |
23,756,708 | 1,008,845 (+5%) |
Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications? detailed info
| Type of flaw | Result |
|---|---|
| Issued tenders without published result | 7% |
| Cancelled contracts | 14% |
| Average requirements modifications count | 3.29 |
| Average decision length | 86.33 days |
Does buyer publish vital data in official journal? detailed info
| Type of flaw | Contracts count |
|---|---|
| Bidders count not published | 0% (0 from 61) |
| Procedure type not published | 0% (0 from 61) |
| Missing buyer ID | 2% (1 from 61) |
| Missing call for tenders | 0% (0 from 61) |
| Missing winning price | 0% (0 from 61) |
| Contract modification by more than 50 % | 2% (1 from 61) |
| Contract | Type of flaw |
|---|---|
| Veřejné sportoviště pro lední sporty v ul. Tyršova, Jihlava - Vybudování dočasného zázemí v suterénu objektu | Missing buyer ID |
| Heroltice - oprava stávající kanalizace | Contract modification by more than 50 % |
Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements? detailed info
| Check | Result | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? | 82% (contracts) | ||||||||||||
| Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? | 1.07 (average mistakes per contract) | ||||||||||||
| Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 56 tenders under the law) |
|
Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally? detailed info
Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.
