Small cities • 2022 • past ranking

Město Turnov

IČO 00276227

Good buyer. Data on buyer profile have relatively good quality. Buyer does not modify or cancel tenders which fosters competition.

3.
ranking
82%
zIndex
Show average values  
67%
Bidder participation
88%
Winner concentration
40%
Pro-competitive tools
75%
Public procurement share on total purchases
100%
Legal misconduct
94%
Competitive contracting
90%
Consistent conduct
100%
Journal data quality
91%
Buyer profile data quality
80%
Supplier feedback

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

67%
average 51%
Largest contracts
Industry 		Bids
Stavební úpravy a přístavba základní školy Mašov, Turnov
Construction work
7
Ø4 in industry
Výstavba domova se zvláštním režimem u Domova důchodců Pohoda Turnov
Construction work
11
Ø4 in industry
Polyfunkční komunitní centrum ul. Skálova, Turnov
Construction work
6
Ø4 in industry
Demolice a výstavba objektu v pasáži p.č. 3, Turnov
Buyer profile data - no industry specification
1
Ø2 in industry
Rekonstrukce ulice Boženy Němcové
Construction, foundation and surface works for highways, roads
6
Ø6 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

88%
average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
MBQ s.r.o.
 2 53,842,412
WORLD INVEST v.o.s.
 1 35,658,170
čekro CZ s.r.o.
 6 16,908,158
ZEPOS RS s.r.o.
 2 12,642,120
STAV-AGENCY s.r.o.
 2 11,651,158
Other suppliers 104 224,739,965

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

40%
average 27%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 40% (2 from 5)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 19)
Division into lots 42% (8 from 19)
E-auction 0% (0 from 19)
Innovative procedure 0% (0 from 19)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

75%
average 68%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 369,269,902
Small scale tenders 134,572,767
Unregulated purchases 391,554,627
Total 895,397,297

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

94%
average 87%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication 		Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Nové návštěvnické centrum a modernizace Regionálního turistického informačního centra v Turnově - část 1.
Contract modification 		3,649,916 958,146 (+27%)
Polyfunkční komunitní centrum ul. Skálova, Turnov
Contract modification 		19,264,132 668,232 (+4%)
Zateplení bytového domu Turnov, Granátová 1897
Contract modification 		7,709,760 609,968 (+8%)
Nové návštěvnické centrum a modernizace Regionálního turistického informačního centra v Turnově
Contract modification 		839,998 201,333 (+24%)

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

90%
average 60%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0.80
Average decision length 49.40 days

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 98%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 19)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 19)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 19)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 19)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 19)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 19)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

91%
average 49%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 95% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.53 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 19 tenders under the law)
0-250K 25 tenders
250K-500K 20 tenders
500K-1000K 19 tenders
1000K+ 27 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

80%
average 81%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.