Lot of money goes into historical contracts and unregulated purchases. Buyer profile has high number of errors.
Is the level of competition satisfactory? detailed info
|
Largest contracts Industry |
Bids |
|---|---|
|
Objekt šaten a zázemí SK FC Hlučín a TJ Hlučín
Construction work |
4
Ø4 in industry |
|
Cyklostezka Hlučín - Darkovičky
Construction work |
5
Ø4 in industry |
|
Dodávka elektrické energie pro město Hlučín, obchodní společnost a příspěvkové organizace, pro období let 2022 a 2023
Electricity |
2
Ø2 in industry |
|
Snížení energetické náročnosti veřejného osvětlení města Hlučín - Etapa I.
Installation of outdoor illumination equipment |
2
Ø5 in industry |
|
Přetlaková hala Hlučín
Construction work |
2
Ø4 in industry |
Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms? detailed info
| Largest suppliers | Contracts count | Contracts volume Kč |
|---|---|---|
|
STAZO, S.R.O. |
1 | 34,391,467 |
|
Pražská plynárenská, a.s. |
2 | 16,976,002 |
|
STRABAG a.s. |
1 | 14,932,353 |
|
ČEZ Energetické služby, s.r.o. |
1 | 6,458,127 |
|
JTA - Holding, spol. s r.o. |
1 | 6,199,772 |
| Other suppliers | 9 | 65,764,241 |
| Supplier | Contracts count | Contracts volume (Kč) |
|---|---|---|
|
STAZO, S.R.O. |
1 | 34,391,467 |
|
Pražská plynárenská, a.s. |
2 | 16,976,002 |
|
STRABAG a.s. |
1 | 14,932,353 |
|
ČEZ Energetické služby, s.r.o. |
1 | 6,458,127 |
|
JTA - Holding, spol. s r.o. |
1 | 6,199,772 |
|
Beta Control s.r.o. |
2 | 5,532,000 |
|
Quality Group s.r.o. |
1 | 1,727,000 |
|
Česká pojišťovna a.s. |
1 | 788,804 |
|
HaskoningDHV Czech Republic, spol. s r.o. |
1 | 690,000 |
|
Ing.arch. Klein Pavel |
1 | 374,000 |
|
GEOVAP, spol. s r.o. |
1 | 332,000 |
|
BDO Advisory s.r.o. |
1 | 248,000 |
Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools? detailed info
| Tool | Contracts count |
|---|---|
| Extended deadlines | 0% (0 from 2) |
| Nonprice competition | 29% (4 from 14) |
| Division into lots | 7% (1 from 14) |
| E-auction | 0% (0 from 14) |
| Innovative procedure | 7% (1 from 14) |
What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law? detailed info
| Purchases | Volume (Kč) |
|---|---|
| Public procurement | 170,627,615 |
| Small scale tenders | 0 |
| Unregulated purchases | 555,148,447 |
| Total | 725,776,063 |
| Budget item | Objem prostredku Kč |
|---|---|
| Durable property purchases | 315,851,126 |
| Material consumption | 15,259,339 |
| Energy consumption | 38,980,329 |
| Other consumption | 0 |
| Sold goods | 0 |
| Activation of durable property | 0 |
| Activation of consumable property | 0 |
| Change of stock | 0 |
| Maintenance and repairs | 113,577,639 |
| Travel costs | 655,703 |
| Representation costs | 565,972 |
| In-house services | 0 |
| Other services | 212,523,984 |
| Small long-term property costs | 11,213,206 |
| Other costs | 17,148,764 |
Did buyer violate law significantly? detailed info
How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures? detailed info
|
Contract Reason for negotiated procedure without publication |
Original contract (Kč) | Contract modification / NPWP (Kč) |
|---|---|---|
|
POSKYTOVÁNÍ KOMPLETNÍ PODPORY SYSTÉMU ELEKTRONICKÉ SPISOVÉ SLUŽBY Not disclosed |
- | 332,000 |
|
Contract Reason for negotiated procedure without publication |
Original contract (Kč) | Contract modification / NPWP (Kč) |
|---|---|---|
|
POSKYTOVÁNÍ KOMPLETNÍ PODPORY SYSTÉMU ELEKTRONICKÉ SPISOVÉ SLUŽBY Not disclosed |
- | 332,000 |
Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications? detailed info
Does buyer publish vital data in official journal? detailed info
| Type of flaw | Contracts count |
|---|---|
| Bidders count not published | 0% (0 from 15) |
| Procedure type not published | 0% (0 from 15) |
| Missing buyer ID | 0% (0 from 15) |
| Missing call for tenders | 0% (0 from 15) |
| Missing winning price | 0% (0 from 15) |
| Contract modification by more than 50 % | 0% (0 from 15) |
Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements? detailed info
| Check | Result | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? | 86% (contracts) | ||||||||||||
| Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? | 0.86 (average mistakes per contract) | ||||||||||||
| Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 14 tenders under the law) |
|
Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally? detailed info
Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.
