Small cities • 2022 • past ranking

Město Hlinsko

IČO 00270059

The competition for contracts is low. Tender documentation is well prepared, thus there is no need to modify or cancel the procedure.

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

24%
average 51%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
SPORTOVNÍ HALA HLINSKO
Multi-purpose sports facilities construction work
7
Ø4 in industry
Zřízení obchvatu místní části Rataje - Hlinsko
Construction work
2
Ø4 in industry
Komunikace a inženýrské sítě včetně přípojek Hlinsko Drachtiny 3. etapa
Construction work
3
Ø4 in industry
Přírodní koupací biotop Hlinsko
Construction work
1
Ø4 in industry
Rekonstrukce bývalé administrativní budovy
Construction work for multi-dwelling buildings and individual houses
6
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

70%
average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
INSTAV Hlinsko a.s.
7 109,249,045
PS BRNO, s.r.o.
1 77,514,185
Stavební firma Libor Jindřichovský s.r.o.
4 51,849,650
MARHOLD a.s.
3 35,992,432
Chládek a Tintěra, Pardubice a.s.
2 28,126,235
Other suppliers 35 339,253,853

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

73%
average 68%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 375,232,590
Small scale tenders 126,921,624
Unregulated purchases 427,680,475
Total 929,834,689

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

79%
average 87%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
SPORTOVNÍ HALA HLINSKO
Contract modification
77,514,185 18,989,634 (+25%)

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

85%
average 60%

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

95%
average 98%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 15)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 15)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 15)
Missing call for tenders 7% (1 from 15)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 15)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 15)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

53%
average 49%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 86% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.86 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 14 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 2 tenders
500K-1000K 7 tenders
1000K+ 18 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

80%
average 81%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.