Small cities • 2022 • past ranking

Město Veselí nad Moravou

IČO 00285455

Good buyer. Tender documentation is well prepared, thus there is no need to modify or cancel the procedure. Buyer profile is in relatively good shape.

21.
ranking
77%
zIndex

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

59%
average 51%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Rezidence Nová tržnice
Works for complete or part construction and civil engineering work
8
Ø4 in industry
Veselí nad Moravou, náměstí Míru, etapa II
Construction work
5
Ø4 in industry
Příprava ploch pro výstavbu RD Hutník - II. etapa
Construction work for highways, roads
7
Ø5 in industry
Průmyslová zóna Veselí nad Moravou
Construction work
11
Ø4 in industry
Revitalizace domu s pečovatelskou službou č. p. 110 ve Veselí nad Moravou
Construction work
5
Ø4 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

83%
average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
PSG Construction a.s.
2 117,796,855
Ekostavby Brno, a.s.
1 69,898,731
VHS Břeclav s.r.o.
4 57,625,689
STAVBY VANTO, s.r.o.
2 23,456,366
SYTYS.cz s.r.o.
4 22,345,710
Other suppliers 47 364,808,205

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

15%
average 27%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 4)
Nonprice competition 10% (2 from 20)
Division into lots 5% (1 from 20)
E-auction 0% (0 from 20)
Innovative procedure 0% (0 from 20)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

81%
average 68%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 453,278,413
Small scale tenders 38,674,666
Unregulated purchases 254,927,976
Total 746,881,054

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 87%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Regenerace sídliště Chaloupy Etapa F2
Contract modification
15,334,406 361,845 (+3%)

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

92%
average 60%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0.67
Average decision length 61.17 days

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 98%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 21)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 21)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 21)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 21)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 21)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 21)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

64%
average 49%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 100% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.30 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 20 tenders under the law)
0-250K 3 tenders
250K-500K 7 tenders
500K-1000K 6 tenders
1000K+ 13 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

80%
average 81%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.