Good buyer. Tender documentation is well prepared, thus there is no need to modify or cancel the procedure. Buyer profile is in relatively good shape.
Is the level of competition satisfactory? detailed info
|
Largest contracts Industry |
Bids |
|---|---|
|
Rezidence Nová tržnice
Works for complete or part construction and civil engineering work |
8
Ø4 in industry |
|
Veselí nad Moravou, náměstí Míru, etapa II
Construction work |
5
Ø4 in industry |
|
Příprava ploch pro výstavbu RD Hutník - II. etapa
Construction work for highways, roads |
7
Ø5 in industry |
|
Průmyslová zóna Veselí nad Moravou
Construction work |
11
Ø4 in industry |
|
Revitalizace domu s pečovatelskou službou č. p. 110 ve Veselí nad Moravou
Construction work |
5
Ø4 in industry |
Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms? detailed info
| Largest suppliers | Contracts count | Contracts volume Kč |
|---|---|---|
|
PSG Construction a.s. |
2 | 117,796,855 |
|
Ekostavby Brno, a.s. |
1 | 69,898,731 |
|
VHS Břeclav s.r.o. |
4 | 57,625,689 |
|
STAVBY VANTO, s.r.o. |
2 | 23,456,366 |
|
SYTYS.cz s.r.o. |
4 | 22,345,710 |
| Other suppliers | 47 | 364,808,205 |
| Supplier | Contracts count | Contracts volume (Kč) |
|---|---|---|
|
PSG Construction a.s. |
2 | 117,796,855 |
|
Ekostavby Brno, a.s. |
1 | 69,898,731 |
|
VHS Břeclav s.r.o. |
4 | 57,625,689 |
|
STAVBY VANTO, s.r.o. |
2 | 23,456,366 |
|
SYTYS.cz s.r.o. |
4 | 22,345,710 |
|
STRABAG a.s. |
1 | 15,978,410 |
|
MEVA-TEC s.r.o. |
2 | 9,758,400 |
|
RYBÁRIK, s.r.o. |
1 | 7,135,286 |
|
KKS, spol. s r.o. |
2 | 6,698,894 |
|
AŽD Praha s.r.o. |
1 | 4,928,474 |
|
Zahradnické úpravy s.r.o. |
1 | 4,717,862 |
|
ELG-ELECTRIC, s.r.o. |
1 | 4,413,222 |
|
Stavební společnost Kněždub, spol. s r.o. |
3 | 4,200,723 |
|
Dopravně inženýrská kancelář, s.r.o. |
1 | 4,075,000 |
|
Alpiq Retail CZ s.r.o. |
1 | 3,996,894 |
|
Česká podnikatelská pojišťovna, a.s., Vienna Insurance Group |
1 | 3,559,676 |
|
ELVOREV s.r.o. |
1 | 3,179,687 |
|
MIKULÍK projekty s.r.o. |
1 | 2,770,000 |
|
AB stavby s.r.o. |
1 | 2,726,223 |
|
Stavební firma ŠMAK, s.r.o. |
1 | 1,991,856 |
|
Allianz pojišťovna, a.s. |
1 | 1,353,896 |
|
F.E.D. s.r.o. |
1 | 1,190,000 |
|
CityTraffic, s.r.o. |
1 | 1,112,000 |
|
MDP GEO, s.r.o. |
3 | 901,100 |
|
Pavlacký s.r.o. |
1 | 899,968 |
|
František Ručný |
1 | 825,000 |
|
elektroben s.r.o. |
1 | 573,964 |
|
DigiDay Czech s.r.o. |
1 | 488,500 |
|
TOPSOFT JKM spol. s r.o. |
1 | 429,416 |
|
Ing. Josef Pelant |
1 | 414,406 |
|
Base System spol. s r.o. |
1 | 394,058 |
|
Pojišťovna VZP, a.s. |
1 | 371,416 |
|
NIO s.r.o. |
1 | 329,500 |
|
Ing. Radek Švenda |
1 | 265,600 |
|
BSP MHA s.r.o. |
1 | 250,868 |
|
ARAVER CZ, s.r.o. |
1 | 225,000 |
|
VÍTKOVICE IT SOLUTIONS a.s. |
1 | 189,970 |
|
SaBnet pro s.r.o. |
1 | 119,580 |
|
Kooperativa pojišťovna, a.s., Vienna Insurance Group |
1 | 24,528 |
Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools? detailed info
| Tool | Contracts count |
|---|---|
| Extended deadlines | 0% (0 from 4) |
| Nonprice competition | 10% (2 from 20) |
| Division into lots | 5% (1 from 20) |
| E-auction | 0% (0 from 20) |
| Innovative procedure | 0% (0 from 20) |
What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law? detailed info
| Purchases | Volume (Kč) |
|---|---|
| Public procurement | 453,278,413 |
| Small scale tenders | 38,674,666 |
| Unregulated purchases | 254,927,976 |
| Total | 746,881,054 |
| Budget item | Objem prostredku Kč |
|---|---|
| Durable property purchases | 559,283,328 |
| Material consumption | 19,409,783 |
| Energy consumption | 12,549,034 |
| Other consumption | 0 |
| Sold goods | 15,510 |
| Activation of durable property | 0 |
| Activation of consumable property | 0 |
| Change of stock | 0 |
| Maintenance and repairs | 29,526,376 |
| Travel costs | 720,183 |
| Representation costs | 3,176,684 |
| In-house services | 0 |
| Other services | 111,619,542 |
| Small long-term property costs | 7,485,126 |
| Other costs | 3,095,487 |
Did buyer violate law significantly? detailed info
How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures? detailed info
|
Contract Reason for negotiated procedure without publication |
Original contract (Kč) | Contract modification / NPWP (Kč) |
|---|---|---|
|
Regenerace sídliště Chaloupy Etapa F2 Contract modification |
15,334,406 | 361,845 (+3%) |
|
Contract Reason for negotiated procedure without publication |
Original contract (Kč) | Contract modification / NPWP (Kč) |
|---|---|---|
|
Regenerace sídliště Chaloupy Etapa F2 Contract modification |
15,334,406 | 361,845 (+3%) |
Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications? detailed info
| Type of flaw | Result |
|---|---|
| Issued tenders without published result | 0% |
| Cancelled contracts | 0% |
| Average requirements modifications count | 0.67 |
| Average decision length | 61.17 days |
| Contract | Modifications count | Cancelled | Without results | Decision length |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Veselí nad Moravou, náměstí Míru, etapa II | 0 | 78 | ||
| Rezidence Nová tržnice - Polyfunkční domy A a B a zpevněné plochy | 1 | 91 | ||
| Revitalizace bažantnice v parku ve Veselí nad Moravou | 0 | 48 | ||
| Rezidence Nová tržnice | 1 | 80 | ||
| Předcházení vzniku odpadů ve Veselí nad Moravou | 1 | 28 | ||
| Příprava ploch pro výstavbu RD Hutník - II. etapa | 1 | 42 |
Does buyer publish vital data in official journal? detailed info
| Type of flaw | Contracts count |
|---|---|
| Bidders count not published | 0% (0 from 21) |
| Procedure type not published | 0% (0 from 21) |
| Missing buyer ID | 0% (0 from 21) |
| Missing call for tenders | 0% (0 from 21) |
| Missing winning price | 0% (0 from 21) |
| Contract modification by more than 50 % | 0% (0 from 21) |
Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements? detailed info
| Check | Result | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? | 100% (contracts) | ||||||||||||
| Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? | 0.30 (average mistakes per contract) | ||||||||||||
| Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 20 tenders under the law) |
|
| Contract | Type of flaw |
|---|---|
| Komplexní pojištění Města Veselí nad Moravou a jeho organizací | Price inconsistent with Journal |
| Sdružené služby dodávky elektrické energie pro město Veselí nad Moravou | Payment information missing |
| Revitalizace domu s pečovatelskou službou č. p. 110 ve Veselí nad Moravou | Payment information missing |
| Rezidence Nová tržnice | Bidders insonsistent with Journal count |
| I/54 Veselí nad Moravou, uliční prostor ul. Svatoplukova | Price inconsistent with Journal |
| Pojištění majetku a odpovědnosti Města Veselí nad Moravou a jeho organizací | Price inconsistent with Journal |
Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally? detailed info
Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.
