Large cities • 2022 • past ranking

Statutární město Opava

IČO 00300535

Purchases are made in legal regime, there is no tendency to portion contracts. SUPPLIER_FEEDBACK_TRUE_1

15.
ranking
75%
zIndex

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

64%
average 51%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
I/11 Opava, severní obchvat - západní část
Road construction works
5
Ø6 in industry
„Komárov a Suché Lazce - splašková kanalizace“
Sewerage work
4
Ø5 in industry
Přestupní terminál Opava východ - ul. Skladištní
Structures construction work
3
Ø4 in industry
Kylešovice - novostavba hasičské zbrojnice
Construction work for buildings relating to law and order or emergency services
2
Ø5 in industry
„Hrnčířská 3, 5, 7, 9, 11 a Masarykova 14“ (okna, střecha, zateplení)
Other building completion work
7
Ø4 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

97%
average 91%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
AKTOR ATE, odštěpný závod v České republice (společník 2)
1 248,540,630
Společnost Opava, MTS DS - MTS Infra
1 248,540,630
Společník 2: Metrostav DS a.s.
1 248,540,630
Sdružení SILNICE.CZ + AKTOR ATE
1 248,540,630
POHL cz, a.s.
2 145,488,889
Other suppliers 129 2,135,224,169

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

32%
average 41%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 20% (1 from 5)
Nonprice competition 4% (2 from 56)
Division into lots 5% (3 from 56)
E-auction 4% (2 from 56)
Innovative procedure 0% (0 from 56)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

81%
average 66%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 1,963,534,687
Small scale tenders 109,462,719
Unregulated purchases 1,119,936,960
Total 3,192,934,366

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

68%
average 79%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
I/11 Opava, severní obchvat - západní část
Contract modification
994,162,520 167,449,060 (+17%)
Kylešovice - novostavba hasičské zbrojnice
Contract modification
42,981,000 12,273,874 (+29%)
Přestupní terminál Opava východ - ul. Skladištní
Contract modification
158,958,377 9,911,758 (+7%)
"ZŠ Komárov - rekonstrukce (vč. vestavby)"
Contract modification
29,444,000 3,300,665 (+12%)
Sídliště Kylešovice - III. etapa
Contract modification
15,297,292 2,797,698 (+19%)

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 100%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 65)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 65)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 65)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 65)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 65)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 65)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

57%
average 69%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 100% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.26 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 65 tenders under the law)
0-250K 2 tenders
250K-500K 10 tenders
500K-1000K 24 tenders
1000K+ 18 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

100%
average 86%

Buyer did receive excellent feedback from its tender participants.