Buyer profile has high number of errors. The competition for contracts is high.
Is the level of competition satisfactory? detailed info
|
Largest contracts Industry |
Bids |
|---|---|
|
Rekonstrukce celého uličního prostoru v ulici Riegrova v Roudnici nad Labem
Construction work |
4
Ø4 in industry |
|
Rekonstrukce celého uličního prostoru v ulici Stadická, Budovatelů, Školní v Roudnici nad Labem
Construction work |
9
Ø4 in industry |
|
Rekonstrukce celého uličního prostoru v ulici Švermova v Roudnici nad Labem
Construction work |
11
Ø4 in industry |
|
Snížení energetické náročnosti veřejné budovy ZŠ Karla Jeřábka č.p. 941 v Roudnici nad Labem
Construction work for school buildings |
15
Ø3 in industry |
|
Přístavba ke stávající budově mateřské školy Pampeliška, ul. Na Vyhlídce č. p. 2275, Roudnice nad Labem
Construction work for school buildings |
7
Ø3 in industry |
Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms? detailed info
| Largest suppliers | Contracts count | Contracts volume Kč |
|---|---|---|
|
PORR a.s. |
1 | 28,058,000 |
|
Metrostav a.s. |
1 | 21,249,000 |
|
STRABAG a.s. |
1 | 16,557,379 |
|
WOOD4YOU s.r.o. |
1 | 14,499,909 |
|
DKK Stav s.r.o. |
1 | 12,416,304 |
| Other suppliers | 4 | 41,877,408 |
| Supplier | Contracts count | Contracts volume (Kč) |
|---|---|---|
|
PORR a.s. |
1 | 28,058,000 |
|
Metrostav a.s. |
1 | 21,249,000 |
|
STRABAG a.s. |
1 | 16,557,379 |
|
WOOD4YOU s.r.o. |
1 | 14,499,909 |
|
DKK Stav s.r.o. |
1 | 12,416,304 |
|
Česká podnikatelská pojišťovna, a.s., Vienna Insurance Group |
1 | 12,069,720 |
|
ARBYD CZ s.r.o. |
1 | 5,941,369 |
|
AV MEDIA, a.s. |
1 | 2,733,000 |
|
Pražská plynárenská, a.s. |
1 | 2,270,735 |
Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools? detailed info
| Tool | Contracts count |
|---|---|
| Extended deadlines | 25% (1 from 4) |
| Nonprice competition | 0% (0 from 11) |
| Division into lots | 0% (0 from 11) |
| E-auction | 0% (0 from 11) |
| Innovative procedure | 0% (0 from 11) |
What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law? detailed info
| Purchases | Volume (Kč) |
|---|---|
| Public procurement | 193,451,752 |
| Small scale tenders | 0 |
| Unregulated purchases | 424,652,820 |
| Total | 618,104,573 |
| Budget item | Objem prostredku Kč |
|---|---|
| Durable property purchases | 318,003,050 |
| Material consumption | 11,447,353 |
| Energy consumption | 43,090,134 |
| Other consumption | 0 |
| Sold goods | 8,000 |
| Activation of durable property | 0 |
| Activation of consumable property | 0 |
| Change of stock | 0 |
| Maintenance and repairs | 28,525,772 |
| Travel costs | 876,791 |
| Representation costs | 1,555,119 |
| In-house services | 0 |
| Other services | 182,637,918 |
| Small long-term property costs | 18,402,975 |
| Other costs | 13,557,460 |
Did buyer violate law significantly? detailed info
How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures? detailed info
|
Contract Reason for negotiated procedure without publication |
Original contract (Kč) | Contract modification / NPWP (Kč) |
|---|---|---|
|
Rekonstrukce celého uličního prostoru v ulici Švermova v Roudnici nad Labem Contract modification |
16,557,379 | 6,285,506 (+38%) |
|
Snížení energetické náročnosti veřejné budovy ZŠ Karla Jeřábka č.p. 941 v Roudnici nad Labem Contract modification |
14,499,909 | 1,693,943 (+12%) |
|
Přístavba ke stávající budově mateřské školy Pampeliška, ul. Na Vyhlídce č. p. 2275, Roudnice nad Labem Contract modification |
12,416,304 | 828,953 (+7%) |
|
Rekonstrukce celého uličního prostoru v ulici Stadická, Budovatelů, Školní v Roudnici nad Labem Contract modification |
21,249,000 | 75,760 (+1%) |
|
Contract Reason for negotiated procedure without publication |
Original contract (Kč) | Contract modification / NPWP (Kč) |
|---|---|---|
|
Rekonstrukce celého uličního prostoru v ulici Švermova v Roudnici nad Labem Contract modification |
16,557,379 | 6,285,506 (+38%) |
|
Snížení energetické náročnosti veřejné budovy ZŠ Karla Jeřábka č.p. 941 v Roudnici nad Labem Contract modification |
14,499,909 | 1,693,943 (+12%) |
|
Přístavba ke stávající budově mateřské školy Pampeliška, ul. Na Vyhlídce č. p. 2275, Roudnice nad Labem Contract modification |
12,416,304 | 828,953 (+7%) |
|
Rekonstrukce celého uličního prostoru v ulici Stadická, Budovatelů, Školní v Roudnici nad Labem Contract modification |
21,249,000 | 75,760 (+1%) |
Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications? detailed info
| Type of flaw | Result |
|---|---|
| Issued tenders without published result | 20% |
| Cancelled contracts | 0% |
| Average requirements modifications count | 1.00 |
| Average decision length | 91.50 days |
| Contract | Modifications count | Cancelled | Without results | Decision length |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rekonstrukce celého uličního prostoru v ulici Stadická, Budovatelů, Školní v Roudnici nad Labem | 0 | > 180 | ||
| Rekonstrukce a stavební úpravy kulturního domu Říp, Husovo nám. čp. 57 a čp. 58, Roudnice n. L. – Projekt interiérů – vybavení objektu | 1 | 67 | ||
| Pojištění majetku, pojištění odpovědnosti, pojištění motorových vozidel a úrazové pojištění | 0 | 72 | ||
| Celoroční údržba veřejné zeleně ve městě Roudnice nad Labem | 0 | 100 | ||
| Rozšíření kapacity ZŠ Školní ul. | 4 | 127 |
Does buyer publish vital data in official journal? detailed info
| Type of flaw | Contracts count |
|---|---|
| Bidders count not published | 0% (0 from 13) |
| Procedure type not published | 0% (0 from 13) |
| Missing buyer ID | 0% (0 from 13) |
| Missing call for tenders | 8% (1 from 13) |
| Missing winning price | 0% (0 from 13) |
| Contract modification by more than 50 % | 0% (0 from 13) |
| Contract | Type of flaw |
|---|---|
| Rekonstrukce celého uličního prostoru v ulici Stadická, Budovatelů, Školní v Roudnici nad Labem | Missing call for tenders |
Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements? detailed info
| Check | Result | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? | 60% (contracts) | ||||||||||||
| Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? | 0.90 (average mistakes per contract) | ||||||||||||
| Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 10 tenders under the law) |
|
Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally? detailed info
Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.
