Small cities • 2022 • past ranking

Město Roudnice nad Labem

IČO 00264334

Buyer profile has high number of errors. The competition for contracts is high.

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

average 51%

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
PORR a.s.
1 28,058,000
Metrostav a.s.
1 21,249,000
1 16,557,379
WOOD4YOU s.r.o.
1 14,499,909
DKK Stav s.r.o.
1 12,416,304
Other suppliers 4 41,877,408

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

average 68%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 193,451,752
Small scale tenders 0
Unregulated purchases 424,652,820
Total 618,104,573

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

average 87%
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Rekonstrukce celého uličního prostoru v ulici Švermova v Roudnici nad Labem
Contract modification
16,557,379 6,285,506 (+38%)
Snížení energetické náročnosti veřejné budovy ZŠ Karla Jeřábka č.p. 941 v Roudnici nad Labem
Contract modification
14,499,909 1,693,943 (+12%)
Přístavba ke stávající budově mateřské školy Pampeliška, ul. Na Vyhlídce č. p. 2275, Roudnice nad Labem
Contract modification
12,416,304 828,953 (+7%)
Rekonstrukce celého uličního prostoru v ulici Stadická, Budovatelů, Školní v Roudnici nad Labem
Contract modification
21,249,000 75,760 (+1%)

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

average 60%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 20%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 1.00
Average decision length 91.50 days

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

average 98%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 13)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 13)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 13)
Missing call for tenders 8% (1 from 13)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 13)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 13)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

average 49%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 60% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.90 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 10 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 0 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

average 81%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.