Small cities • 2020 • past ranking

Město Choceň

IČO 00278955

Uncompetitive procedures are overused. Buyer profile is in relatively good shape.

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

56%
average 47%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
VOSTELČICE
Buyer profile data - no industry specification
7
Ø2 in industry
Nástavba a přístavba ZŠ Sv. Čecha, Sv. Čecha 1686, Choceň
Construction work
2
Ø4 in industry
Svoz a nakládání s odpadem města Choceň
Refuse collection services
2
Ø2 in industry
Revitalizace přednádraží Choceň-Terminál v zeleni
Construction work
9
Ø4 in industry
Sdružené služby dodávky elektřiny pro město Choceň, jeho příspěvkové organizace a společnosti, ve kterých má město Choceň majetkový podíl
Electricity
3
Ø3 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

78%
average 82%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
PSK, v.o.s. Choceň
9 45,704,738
ALTERINVESTA CZ s.r.o.
2 44,345,055
PP-GROUP.cz s.r.o.
1 26,851,579
EKOLA České Libchavy s.r.o.
1 21,745,925
Amper Market, a.s.
1 16,000,000
Other suppliers 36 59,157,413

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

34%
average 32%

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

64%
average 58%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 89,026,815
Small scale tenders 83,350,860
Unregulated purchases 243,413,628
Total 415,791,304

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

50%
average 89%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Nástavba a přístavba MŠ Vostelčice, Choceň, Smetanova 1682
Outside directive scope
- 19,754,265

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

64%
average 64%
Average values displayed

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 96%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 8)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 8)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 8)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 8)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 8)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 8)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

56%
average 43%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 88% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.25 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 8 tenders under the law)
0-250K 1 tender
250K-500K 1 tender
500K-1000K 17 tenders
1000K+ 23 tenders