Large cities • 2022 • past ranking

Město Uherské Hradiště

IČO 00291471

Competitions are open to multiple bidders. Buyer divides contracts into lots to foster participation of SME's

11.
ranking
76%
zIndex

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

50%
average 51%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Rekonstrukce sportovního areálu sídliště Mojmír, Uherské Hradiště
Construction work for sports facilities
1
Ø3 in industry
Revitalizace centrálních ulic MPZ - Prostřední a Mlýnská
Construction work for highways, roads
3
Ø5 in industry
Výměna nepropustných ploch - udržení vody v krajině, Uh. Hradiště, Štěpnice II
Construction work
1
Ø4 in industry
Stavební úpravy bytového domu ul. Kollárova č. p. 403
Construction work for multi-dwelling buildings and individual houses
5
Ø4 in industry
Regenerace sídliště 28. října – II. etapa
Construction work
6
Ø4 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

84%
average 91%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
STRABAG a.s.
9 56,187,533
SVS - CORRECT, spol. s r.o.
8 39,505,659
STAMOS Uherské Hradiště, spol. s r.o.
6 29,412,887
PORR a.s.
3 26,173,974
CENTROPOL ENERGY, a.s.
1 17,074,200
Other suppliers 138 320,976,614

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

56%
average 41%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 50% (1 from 2)
Nonprice competition 18% (4 from 22)
Division into lots 18% (4 from 22)
E-auction 0% (0 from 22)
Innovative procedure 0% (0 from 22)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

59%
average 66%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 401,943,374
Small scale tenders 225,114,864
Unregulated purchases 1,171,454,308
Total 1,798,512,546

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

97%
average 79%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
MěÚ UH, BUDOVA RADNICE - KOMPLETNÍ OBNOVA SO 01 A SO 02
Contract modification
9,775,937 1,528,834 (+16%)

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

56%
average 56%
Average values displayed

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 100%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 23)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 23)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 23)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 23)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 23)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 23)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

73%
average 69%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 91% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.09 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 23 tenders under the law)
0-250K 2 tenders
250K-500K 5 tenders
500K-1000K 50 tenders
1000K+ 42 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

80%
average 86%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.