Large cities • 2022 • past ranking

Statutární město Prostějov

IČO 00288659

Good buyer. Buyer divides contracts into lots to foster participation of SME's Tender documentation is well prepared, thus there is no need to modify or cancel the procedure.


Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

average 51%
Largest contracts
„Zimní stadion – šatny pro mládež“
Construction work
Ø4 in industry
Dopravní terminál na Floriánském náměstí, Prostějov
Construction work for buildings relating to road transport
Ø5 in industry
„Regenerace sídliště B. Šmerala v Prostějově“
Construction work
Ø4 in industry
„Regenerace sídliště Brněnská_ul. Dobrovského, Prostějov“
Construction, foundation and surface works for highways, roads
Ø6 in industry
„Přístavba tělocvičny u DDM Vápenice, Prostějov“
Multi-purpose sports facilities construction work
Ø4 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

average 91%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Skanska a.s.
4 78,235,846
E.PROXIMA, s.r.o.
2 62,577,775
3 49,600,861
POZEMSTAV Prostějov, a.s.
6 48,371,263
Prostějovská stavební společnost - PROSTAS, s.r.o.
7 40,521,937
Other suppliers 197 596,648,724

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

average 41%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 25% (2 from 8)
Nonprice competition 58% (22 from 38)
Division into lots 13% (5 from 38)
E-auction 5% (2 from 38)
Innovative procedure 3% (1 from 38)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

average 66%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 946,797,044
Small scale tenders 332,047,966
Unregulated purchases 1,935,390,935
Total 3,214,235,946

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

average 79%

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

average 100%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 51)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 51)
Missing buyer ID 2% (1 from 51)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 51)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 51)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 51)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

average 69%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 100% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.74 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 50 tenders under the law)
0-250K 35 tenders
250K-500K 27 tenders
500K-1000K 33 tenders
1000K+ 57 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

average 86%

Buyer did receive excellent feedback from its tender participants.