Small cities • 2022 • past ranking

Město Hranice

IČO 00301311

SUPPLIER_FEEDBACK_TRUE_2 Buyer divides contracts into lots to foster participation of SME's

51.
ranking
74%
zIndex

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

61%
average 51%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Revitalizace městského hřbitova v Hranicích - znovuvyhlášení
Construction work
8
Ø4 in industry
Lokalita pod křivým-rekonstrukce ulice Havlíčkova
Construction work
4
Ø4 in industry
Modernizace ZŠ Šromotovo v Hranicích
Construction work
1
Ø4 in industry
Hranice - cyklověž
Construction work
1
Ø4 in industry
Regenerace panelového sídliště Struhlovsko 2. etapa - 1. část
Construction work
10
Ø4 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

88%
average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
STRABAG a.s.
3 35,653,732
SAS 4 Finish, s.r.o,
1 33,276,796
NOSTA, s.r.o.
2 22,437,990
Pražská plynárenská, a.s.
8 20,723,733
EP ENERGY TRADING, a.s.
3 18,456,145
Other suppliers 68 188,431,166

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

38%
average 27%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 11% (2 from 19)
Nonprice competition 7% (2 from 28)
Division into lots 21% (6 from 28)
E-auction 0% (0 from 28)
Innovative procedure 0% (0 from 28)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

59%
average 68%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 303,748,654
Small scale tenders 41,284,330
Unregulated purchases 654,162,712
Total 999,195,696

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

94%
average 87%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Socha T.G.Masaryka na Školním náměstí v Hranicích
Technical exclusivity
- 3,035,000

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

61%
average 60%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 11%
Cancelled contracts 5%
Average requirements modifications count 1.63
Average decision length 75.06 days

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

95%
average 98%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 35)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 35)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 35)
Missing call for tenders 6% (2 from 35)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 35)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 35)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

43%
average 49%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 71% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.45 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 31 tenders under the law)
0-250K 4 tenders
250K-500K 6 tenders
500K-1000K 15 tenders
1000K+ 7 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

100%
average 81%

Buyer did receive excellent feedback from its tender participants.