Large cities • 2022 • past ranking

Statutární město Teplice

IČO 00266621

Small number of firms recieve most of contracts. Buyer does not support competition by using e-auctions, lots or extended deadlines.

Show average values  
55%
Bidder participation
68%
Winner concentration
19%
Pro-competitive tools
66%
Public procurement share on total purchases
79%
Legal misconduct
96%
Competitive contracting
66%
Consistent conduct
98%
Journal data quality
60%
Buyer profile data quality
80%
Supplier feedback

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

55%
average 51%
Largest contracts
Industry 		Bids
Komplexní zajištění svozu odpadu na území Statutárního města Teplice v letech 2021 - 2025
Refuse collection services
1
Ø1 in industry
Rekonstrukce Bystřice v Teplicích
River regulation and flood control works
4
Ø4 in industry
Dodávka 5 ks nízkopodlažních dvounápravových trolejbusů s alternativním pohonem
Rolling stock
1
Ø1 in industry
ÚDRŽBA MĚSTSKÉ ZELENĚ NA ÚZEMÍ STATUTÁRNÍHO MĚSTA TEPLICE 2021-2022
Horticultural services
1
Ø4 in industry
Rozšíření trolejbusových tratí v Teplicích - stavba 2
Construction work
2
Ø4 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

68%
average 91%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Marius Pedersen a.s.
 19 319,686,789
Elektroline a.s.
 5 74,151,423
Vodohospodářské stavby, společnost s ručením omezeným
 2 71,453,947
Bulharská hydrostavební společnost s.r.o.
 1 67,470,216
ŠKODA ELECTRIC a.s.
 1 66,100,000
Other suppliers 69 676,100,560

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

19%
average 41%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 17% (3 from 18)
Nonprice competition 3% (1 from 36)
Division into lots 0% (0 from 36)
E-auction 0% (0 from 36)
Innovative procedure 0% (0 from 36)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

66%
average 66%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 1,230,469,679
Small scale tenders 89,931,448
Unregulated purchases 1,682,850,589
Total 3,003,251,716

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

96%
average 79%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication 		Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Dodávka košové montážní plošiny pro práci na trakčním vedení
Outside directive scope 		- 2,079,800
Kostel Povýšení sv. Kříže
Contract modification 		7,993,891 1,519,307 (+20%)
Revitalizace Dolního rybníku v Zámecké zahradě v Teplicích
Contract modification 		4,525,411 1,357,622 (+30%)
ZŠ Edisonova – výstavba nového hřiště - FA
Contract modification 		13,926,817 691,263 (+5%)
ZŠ Metelkovo – oprava fasády objektu 1. etapa
Contract modification 		4,891,658 487,746 (+10%)

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

66%
average 56%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 12%
Average requirements modifications count 1.18
Average decision length 81.41 days

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

98%
average 100%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 38)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 38)
Missing buyer ID 3% (1 from 38)
Missing call for tenders 5% (2 from 38)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 38)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 38)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

60%
average 69%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 97% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.44 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 36 tenders under the law)
0-250K 2 tenders
250K-500K 7 tenders
500K-1000K 18 tenders
1000K+ 21 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

80%
average 86%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.