Small cities • 2020 • past ranking

Město Uničov

IČO 00299634

Buyer profile has high number of errors. Tender documentation is well prepared, thus there is no need to modify or cancel the procedure.

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

62%
average 47%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Tlaková splašková kanalizace Uničov, m.č. Nová Dědina, Dolní a Horní Sukolom
Construction work for water and sewage pipelines
11
Ø5 in industry
Rekonstrukce a bezbariérové úpravy chodníků a přechodů v Uničově
Construction work
3
Ø4 in industry
Cyklostezka Uničov, m. č. Brníčko - Újezd
Road construction works
12
Ø6 in industry
Snížení energetické náročnosti - ZŠ Haškova Uničov
Construction work
3
Ø3 in industry
Cyklostezka Uničov, m. č. Nová Dědina - Šumvald
Cycle path construction work
8
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

51%
average 82%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
KARETA s.r.o.
6 73,309,000
SWIETELSKY stavební s.r.o.
1 26,310,000
FACTORY 2014 a.s.
1 15,440,000
VHH THERMONT s.r.o.
2 15,370,000
RI-STAV s.r.o.
1 13,445,000
Other suppliers 4 34,001,447

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

40%
average 32%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 100% (3 from 3)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 14)
Division into lots 0% (0 from 14)
E-auction 93% (13 from 14)
Innovative procedure 0% (0 from 14)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

46%
average 58%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 160,238,504
Small scale tenders 0
Unregulated purchases 611,205,444
Total 771,443,948

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 89%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

100%
average 64%

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

99%
average 96%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 14)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 14)
Missing buyer ID 7% (1 from 14)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 14)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 14)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 14)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

0%
average 43%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 21% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.64 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 14 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 0 tenders