Small cities • 2022 • past ranking

Město Frenštát pod Radhoštěm

IČO 00297852

Buyer recieves unusually small ammount of bids. Data on buyer profile have relatively good quality.

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

average 51%
Largest contracts
Provozování vodovodu a kanalizace ve vlastnictví města Frenštát pod Radhoštěm
Buyer profile data - no industry specification
Ø2 in industry
Cyklostezka Lubina - Lomná
Construction work
Ø4 in industry
Odkanalizování lokality Kopaná ve Frenštátě pod Radhoštěm - 1. etapa
Construction work for water and sewage pipelines
Ø4 in industry
Prodloužení vodovodního řádu ul. Střelniční, Frenštát pod Radhoštěm
Construction work for water and sewage pipelines
Ø5 in industry
Stavební úpravy BD Dolní 307-309, Frenštát pod Radhoštěm
Construction work for houses
Ø4 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Severomoravské vodovody a kanalizace Ostrava a.s.
1 40,480,000
1 22,092,282
4 21,766,311
COMMODUM, spol. s r.o.
1 20,672,623
PORR a.s.
6 19,239,739
Other suppliers 111 190,560,409

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

average 27%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 5)
Nonprice competition 17% (3 from 18)
Division into lots 0% (0 from 18)
E-auction 0% (0 from 18)
Innovative procedure 0% (0 from 18)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

average 68%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 170,817,400
Small scale tenders 91,607,245
Unregulated purchases 597,611,410
Total 860,036,055

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

average 87%
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Odkanalizování lokality Kopaná ve Frenštátě pod Radhoštěm - 1. etapa
Contract modification
20,672,623 2,564,295 (+13%)
Stavební úpravy BD Dolní 434, Frenštát pod Radhoštěm
Contract modification
4,088,639 511,298 (+13%)
Prodloužení vodovodního řádu ul. Střelniční, Frenštát pod Radhoštěm
Contract modification
12,889,305 27,645 (+1%)

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

average 60%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 20%
Average requirements modifications count 0.40
Average decision length 70.80 days

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

average 98%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 20)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 20)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 20)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 20)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 20)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 20)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

average 49%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 89% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.89 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 19 tenders under the law)
0-250K 45 tenders
250K-500K 18 tenders
500K-1000K 17 tenders
1000K+ 15 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

average 81%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.