Buyer recieves unusually small ammount of bids. Data on buyer profile have relatively good quality.
Is the level of competition satisfactory? detailed info
|
Largest contracts Industry |
Bids |
|---|---|
|
Provozování vodovodu a kanalizace ve vlastnictví města Frenštát pod Radhoštěm
Buyer profile data - no industry specification |
1
Ø2 in industry |
|
Cyklostezka Lubina - Lomná
Construction work |
1
Ø4 in industry |
|
Odkanalizování lokality Kopaná ve Frenštátě pod Radhoštěm - 1. etapa
Construction work for water and sewage pipelines |
4
Ø4 in industry |
|
Prodloužení vodovodního řádu ul. Střelniční, Frenštát pod Radhoštěm
Construction work for water and sewage pipelines |
3
Ø5 in industry |
|
Stavební úpravy BD Dolní 307-309, Frenštát pod Radhoštěm
Construction work for houses |
3
Ø4 in industry |
Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms? detailed info
| Largest suppliers | Contracts count | Contracts volume Kč |
|---|---|---|
|
Severomoravské vodovody a kanalizace Ostrava a.s. |
1 | 40,480,000 |
|
EP ENERGY TRADING, a.s. |
1 | 22,092,282 |
|
FABRIKO MORAVA, s.r.o. |
4 | 21,766,311 |
|
COMMODUM, spol. s r.o. |
1 | 20,672,623 |
|
PORR a.s. |
6 | 19,239,739 |
| Other suppliers | 111 | 190,560,409 |
| Supplier | Contracts count | Contracts volume (Kč) |
|---|---|---|
|
Severomoravské vodovody a kanalizace Ostrava a.s. |
1 | 40,480,000 |
|
EP ENERGY TRADING, a.s. |
1 | 22,092,282 |
|
FABRIKO MORAVA, s.r.o. |
4 | 21,766,311 |
|
COMMODUM, spol. s r.o. |
1 | 20,672,623 |
|
PORR a.s. |
6 | 19,239,739 |
|
MVEX stavby s.r.o. |
1 | 16,394,060 |
|
VODOSTAV OSTRAVA, spol. s r.o. |
1 | 12,889,305 |
|
AVE CZ odpadové hospodářství s.r.o. |
2 | 10,327,861 |
|
CENTROPOL ENERGY, a.s. |
1 | 5,985,525 |
|
SWIETELSKY stavební s.r.o. |
4 | 4,959,474 |
|
RADEKOV spol. s r.o. |
2 | 4,947,050 |
|
AUTOCONT a.s. |
1 | 4,066,300 |
|
AutoCont CZ a.s. |
1 | 4,066,300 |
|
Stavitelství Sedláček s.r.o. |
2 | 3,773,283 |
|
ELNERMONT s.r.o. |
1 | 3,497,511 |
|
Energy Benefit Centre a.s. |
1 | 3,157,000 |
|
Vodafone Czech Republic a.s. |
1 | 2,951,906 |
|
KAHIM stavby s.r.o. |
2 | 2,949,096 |
|
COLAS CZ, a.s. |
1 | 2,713,871 |
|
Hasičská vzájemná pojišťovna, a.s. |
1 | 2,472,170 |
|
SUBSTAV Invest s.r.o. |
1 | 2,140,104 |
|
EUROprojekt build and technology s. r. o. |
3 | 1,820,579 |
|
JANKOSTAV s.r.o. |
2 | 1,480,929 |
|
Generali Česká pojišťovna a.s. |
1 | 1,436,700 |
|
STAVIA - silniční stavby, a.s. |
2 | 1,319,008 |
|
Petr Bzel- Bsound |
2 | 1,233,500 |
|
TESAREM s.r.o. |
1 | 1,096,138 |
|
V+V SAVEKO s.r.o. |
2 | 925,426 |
|
EB ELEKTRO BARTOŠ s.r.o. |
1 | 880,244 |
|
MATOSA PROFISTAV s.r.o. |
1 | 832,388 |
|
LAPY Zahradnictví s.r.o. |
1 | 828,822 |
|
Jiří Šperlík |
3 | 817,928 |
|
BESKYDGROUP s.r.o. |
3 | 815,041 |
|
AGROCAR s.r.o. |
1 | 629,900 |
|
Ing.Tomáš Horák |
8 | 622,725 |
|
CONSTRUCTUS s.r.o. |
1 | 574,000 |
|
Lubomír Kopřiva |
2 | 573,017 |
|
Jan Líbal |
1 | 467,822 |
|
Porsche Inter Auto CZ spol. s r.o. |
1 | 441,333 |
|
TV Beskyd s.r.o. |
1 | 417,600 |
|
GASTRO MACH, s.r.o. |
1 | 363,900 |
|
AlfaPOL s.r.o. |
1 | 348,510 |
|
RENOVA, s.r.o. |
1 | 302,105 |
|
Jiří Chromčák |
1 | 297,481 |
|
KINOSERVIS s.r.o. |
1 | 293,600 |
|
ATS-TELCOM PRAHA a.s. |
1 | 290,000 |
|
Petr Badač |
2 | 279,028 |
|
emam s.r.o. |
1 | 264,562 |
|
E B - stavební společnost, s. r. o. |
1 | 253,525 |
|
Autocentrum Lukáš s.r.o. |
1 | 247,917 |
|
FLEXOSTAV s.r.o. |
1 | 246,587 |
|
Michal Zbořil |
2 | 213,126 |
|
CERGO ENERGY s.r.o. |
2 | 208,500 |
|
XEVOS Solutions s.r.o. |
1 | 206,740 |
|
Juta Agency s.r.o. |
1 | 171,596 |
|
JOHNNY SERVIS s.r.o. |
1 | 147,860 |
|
MVM SOLUTION s.r.o. |
2 | 147,466 |
|
Miroslav Šimůnek |
1 | 145,000 |
|
WC Servis s.r.o. |
1 | 144,575 |
|
PROMAN s.r.o. |
1 | 139,300 |
|
Eva Palová |
1 | 130,000 |
|
Kadlec - elektronika, s.r.o. |
1 | 129,100 |
|
Dušan Cigánek |
1 | 125,844 |
|
Radomír Myslivec |
1 | 116,646 |
|
Projekční a inženýrská činnost Groman a spol. s.r.o. |
1 | 100,000 |
|
FRIPOS Valašské Meziříčí, s.r.o. |
1 | 90,000 |
|
OFFICEO s.r.o. |
1 | 83,861 |
|
Dozor koordinátor s.r.o. |
1 | 79,338 |
|
PSWNET Zlín s.r.o. |
1 | 75,530 |
|
KASPA papír s. r. o. |
1 | 67,594 |
|
Pavel Volek |
1 | 65,000 |
|
Solvillage s.r.o. |
1 | 60,000 |
|
Ivan Kaspřák - KASPA vše pro kancelář |
1 | 57,511 |
|
Ing. Jakub ANDĚL |
1 | 53,000 |
|
Milan Vician |
1 | 50,800 |
|
Ing. Milan Sauer |
1 | 44,000 |
|
Ing.arch. Martin Janda |
1 | 37,000 |
|
Velkoobchod ŠAS,s.r.o. |
1 | 33,757 |
|
SATUM CZECH s.r.o. |
1 | 5,000 |
Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools? detailed info
| Tool | Contracts count |
|---|---|
| Extended deadlines | 0% (0 from 5) |
| Nonprice competition | 17% (3 from 18) |
| Division into lots | 0% (0 from 18) |
| E-auction | 0% (0 from 18) |
| Innovative procedure | 0% (0 from 18) |
What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law? detailed info
| Purchases | Volume (Kč) |
|---|---|
| Public procurement | 170,817,400 |
| Small scale tenders | 91,607,245 |
| Unregulated purchases | 597,611,410 |
| Total | 860,036,055 |
| Budget item | Objem prostredku Kč |
|---|---|
| Durable property purchases | 487,533,072 |
| Material consumption | 34,928,840 |
| Energy consumption | 52,792,317 |
| Other consumption | 0 |
| Sold goods | 1,128,025 |
| Activation of durable property | 0 |
| Activation of consumable property | 0 |
| Change of stock | 0 |
| Maintenance and repairs | 117,626,571 |
| Travel costs | 945,697 |
| Representation costs | 1,550,187 |
| In-house services | 0 |
| Other services | 131,690,585 |
| Small long-term property costs | 12,289,405 |
| Other costs | 19,551,355 |
Did buyer violate law significantly? detailed info
How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures? detailed info
|
Contract Reason for negotiated procedure without publication |
Original contract (Kč) | Contract modification / NPWP (Kč) |
|---|---|---|
|
Odkanalizování lokality Kopaná ve Frenštátě pod Radhoštěm - 1. etapa Contract modification |
20,672,623 | 2,564,295 (+13%) |
|
Stavební úpravy BD Dolní 434, Frenštát pod Radhoštěm Contract modification |
4,088,639 | 511,298 (+13%) |
|
Prodloužení vodovodního řádu ul. Střelniční, Frenštát pod Radhoštěm Contract modification |
12,889,305 | 27,645 (+1%) |
|
Contract Reason for negotiated procedure without publication |
Original contract (Kč) | Contract modification / NPWP (Kč) |
|---|---|---|
|
Odkanalizování lokality Kopaná ve Frenštátě pod Radhoštěm - 1. etapa Contract modification |
20,672,623 | 2,564,295 (+13%) |
|
Stavební úpravy BD Dolní 434, Frenštát pod Radhoštěm Contract modification |
4,088,639 | 511,298 (+13%) |
|
Prodloužení vodovodního řádu ul. Střelniční, Frenštát pod Radhoštěm Contract modification |
12,889,305 | 27,645 (+1%) |
Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications? detailed info
| Type of flaw | Result |
|---|---|
| Issued tenders without published result | 0% |
| Cancelled contracts | 20% |
| Average requirements modifications count | 0.40 |
| Average decision length | 70.80 days |
| Contract | Modifications count | Cancelled | Without results | Decision length |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cyklostezka Lubina - Lomná | 2 | 109 | ||
| Svoz odpadu pro příspěvkové organizace | 0 | 105 | ||
| ZŠ Záhuní, Frenštát pod Radhoštěm - Komplexní oprava kuchyně školní jídelny | 0 | 75 | ||
| Svoz komunálního odpadu - Frenštát pod Radhoštěm | 0 | 21 | ||
| Svoz komunálního odpadu - Frenštát pod Radhoštěm | 0 | 44 |
Does buyer publish vital data in official journal? detailed info
| Type of flaw | Contracts count |
|---|---|
| Bidders count not published | 0% (0 from 20) |
| Procedure type not published | 0% (0 from 20) |
| Missing buyer ID | 0% (0 from 20) |
| Missing call for tenders | 0% (0 from 20) |
| Missing winning price | 0% (0 from 20) |
| Contract modification by more than 50 % | 0% (0 from 20) |
Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements? detailed info
| Check | Result | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? | 89% (contracts) | ||||||||||||
| Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? | 0.89 (average mistakes per contract) | ||||||||||||
| Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 19 tenders under the law) |
|
Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally? detailed info
Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.
