Data on buyer profile have relatively good quality. Buyer does not use tools to support competition.
Is the level of competition satisfactory? detailed info
Largest contracts Industry |
Bids |
---|---|
Kompostárna Třebovice
Engineering works and construction works |
4
Ø4 in industry |
Rekonstrukce chodníků podél silnice I/14 v České Třebové, realizace úseku č. 2
Installation works of walkways |
1
Ø4 in industry |
Zateplení Mateřské školy Habrmanova, Česká Třebová
Construction work for kindergarten buildings |
2
Ø4 in industry |
Singletrack Glacensis – nástupní místo Peklák
Construction work |
1
Ø4 in industry |
Cyklostezka Česká Třebová - Rybník
Cycle path construction work |
6
Ø5 in industry |
Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms? detailed info
Largest suppliers | Contracts count | Contracts volume Kč |
---|---|---|
AGILE spol. s r.o. |
5 | 64,358,511 |
EP ENERGY TRADING, a.s. |
4 | 29,676,054 |
Pražská plynárenská, a.s. |
5 | 25,597,437 |
EUROVIA CS, a.s. |
1 | 18,744,270 |
PROFISTAV Litomyšl, a.s. |
1 | 14,222,385 |
Other suppliers | 108 | 276,071,494 |
Supplier | Contracts count | Contracts volume (Kč) |
---|---|---|
AGILE spol. s r.o. |
5 | 64,358,511 |
EP ENERGY TRADING, a.s. |
4 | 29,676,054 |
Pražská plynárenská, a.s. |
5 | 25,597,437 |
EUROVIA CS, a.s. |
1 | 18,744,270 |
PROFISTAV Litomyšl, a.s. |
1 | 14,222,385 |
RYDO, spol. s r.o. |
7 | 14,016,431 |
Slovenské elektrárne Česká republika, s.r.o. |
2 | 12,468,510 |
DS INTEX s.r.o. |
4 | 9,602,974 |
KOZEL-STAVBY s.r.o. |
1 | 8,656,536 |
FORAGRI s.r.o. |
1 | 6,500,000 |
ELTODO OSVĚTLENÍ, s.r.o. |
2 | 5,784,109 |
ACP Engineering s.r.o. |
1 | 5,568,448 |
MOUDER s.r.o. |
1 | 5,396,175 |
JRK Česká republika s.r.o. |
1 | 5,020,000 |
Ján Mucha |
1 | 4,489,287 |
ZRUP Příbram a.s. |
1 | 4,486,858 |
Vladimír Ureš |
4 | 3,563,598 |
CENTROPOL ENERGY, a.s. |
2 | 3,281,040 |
Řeznictví Sloupnice s.r.o. |
3 | 2,892,960 |
ČSOB Pojišťovna, a. s., člen holdingu ČSOB |
1 | 2,847,501 |
Sefir s.r.o. |
2 | 2,471,570 |
Lumius, spol. s r.o. |
1 | 2,372,058 |
AUTO VINKLER, s.r.o. |
1 | 2,241,683 |
XC tech s.r.o. |
1 | 2,189,500 |
AQUEKO, spol. s r.o. |
1 | 2,070,200 |
Atelier KK architekti s.r.o. |
1 | 2,052,700 |
Eko Bi s.r.o. |
2 | 2,016,764 |
Bidfood Czech Republic s.r.o. |
4 | 1,683,125 |
ELEKTRO ŠUDOMA, s.r.o. |
2 | 1,681,287 |
Jiří Procházka |
3 | 1,502,626 |
T-Mobile Czech Republic a.s. |
1 | 1,478,879 |
Ing. Petr Skopal |
4 | 1,424,540 |
CUBESPACE s.r.o. |
1 | 1,256,425 |
W.H.A. system, spol. s r. o. |
1 | 1,049,000 |
ELEKTRO-FLEXI s.r.o. |
1 | 942,719 |
SAMAB PRESS GROUP, a.s. |
1 | 789,000 |
EXVER FOOD, s.r.o. |
2 | 760,874 |
TROCKENBAU-Vereš s.r.o. |
1 | 747,953 |
JD Dlouhý, s.r.o. |
1 | 703,800 |
Pavel Brindzák |
2 | 604,728 |
TEZA, s. r. o. |
1 | 578,510 |
GASTRO komplet UO s.r.o. |
1 | 548,791 |
REKLAMA CENTRUM, spol. s r.o. |
2 | 469,691 |
DINO TRADING spol. s r.o. |
1 | 462,486 |
HAITECO CZ s.r.o. |
1 | 429,000 |
Kubík a.s. |
2 | 425,482 |
RSM CZ a.s. |
1 | 399,860 |
Chameleos s.r.o |
1 | 397,744 |
David Skalický |
1 | 390,000 |
Koncept s.r.o. |
1 | 388,957 |
Damaris Solutions s.r.o. |
1 | 385,000 |
Martin Buchl |
1 | 376,857 |
CBA NUGET s.r.o. |
1 | 368,140 |
Netfox s.r.o. |
1 | 365,904 |
Zdeněk Němec |
1 | 362,906 |
BON-CAR Svitavy, s.r.o. |
1 | 354,901 |
Jindřich Schlesinger |
1 | 349,699 |
R ALTRA spol. s r.o. |
1 | 345,290 |
OLFIN Car s.r.o. |
1 | 339,917 |
H-FLOOR s.r.o. |
1 | 322,908 |
Prosto interiér s.r.o. |
1 | 310,661 |
KANONA a.s. |
1 | 309,190 |
TOPSOFT JKM spol. s r.o. |
1 | 300,592 |
PAPERA s.r.o. |
1 | 298,907 |
Bc. Michal Smejkal |
1 | 266,185 |
ARBOTYL s.r.o. |
1 | 228,186 |
Petr Kostka |
1 | 165,610 |
KOVO, výrobní družstvo |
1 | 162,005 |
Mgr. Karel Kubišta |
2 | 156,399 |
MARELL s.r.o. |
1 | 150,350 |
Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools? detailed info
Tool | Contracts count |
---|---|
Extended deadlines | 0% (0 from 2) |
Nonprice competition | 0% (0 from 17) |
Division into lots | 6% (1 from 17) |
E-auction | 0% (0 from 17) |
Innovative procedure | 0% (0 from 17) |
What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law? detailed info
Purchases | Volume (Kč) |
---|---|
Public procurement | 259,638,543 |
Small scale tenders | 250,807,354 |
Unregulated purchases | 435,649,878 |
Total | 946,095,775 |
Budget item | Objem prostredku Kč |
---|---|
Durable property purchases | 441,437,692 |
Material consumption | 9,178,317 |
Energy consumption | 8,186,132 |
Other consumption | 0 |
Sold goods | 88,422 |
Activation of durable property | 0 |
Activation of consumable property | 0 |
Change of stock | 0 |
Maintenance and repairs | 172,956,471 |
Travel costs | 1,592,197 |
Representation costs | 5,774,406 |
In-house services | 0 |
Other services | 291,292,567 |
Small long-term property costs | 8,414,647 |
Other costs | 7,174,926 |
Did buyer violate law significantly? detailed info
How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures? detailed info
Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications? detailed info
Does buyer publish vital data in official journal? detailed info
Type of flaw | Contracts count |
---|---|
Bidders count not published | 0% (0 from 24) |
Procedure type not published | 0% (0 from 24) |
Missing buyer ID | 0% (0 from 24) |
Missing call for tenders | 0% (0 from 24) |
Missing winning price | 0% (0 from 24) |
Contract modification by more than 50 % | 4% (1 from 24) |
Contract | Type of flaw |
---|---|
Singletrack Glacensis – nástupní místo Peklák | Contract modification by more than 50 % |
Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements? detailed info
Check | Result | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? | 100% (contracts) | ||||||||||||
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? | 1.08 (average mistakes per contract) | ||||||||||||
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 24 tenders under the law) |
|
Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally? detailed info
Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.