Data on buyer profile have relatively good quality. Buyer does not use tools to support competition.
Is the level of competition satisfactory? detailed info
|
Largest contracts Industry |
Bids |
|---|---|
|
Kompostárna Třebovice
Engineering works and construction works |
4
Ø4 in industry |
|
Rekonstrukce chodníků podél silnice I/14 v České Třebové, realizace úseku č. 2
Installation works of walkways |
1
Ø4 in industry |
|
Zateplení Mateřské školy Habrmanova, Česká Třebová
Construction work for kindergarten buildings |
2
Ø4 in industry |
|
Singletrack Glacensis – nástupní místo Peklák
Construction work |
1
Ø4 in industry |
|
Cyklostezka Česká Třebová - Rybník
Cycle path construction work |
6
Ø5 in industry |
Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms? detailed info
| Largest suppliers | Contracts count | Contracts volume Kč |
|---|---|---|
|
AGILE spol. s r.o. |
5 | 64,358,511 |
|
EP ENERGY TRADING, a.s. |
4 | 29,676,054 |
|
Pražská plynárenská, a.s. |
5 | 25,597,437 |
|
EUROVIA CS, a.s. |
1 | 18,744,270 |
|
PROFISTAV Litomyšl, a.s. |
1 | 14,222,385 |
| Other suppliers | 108 | 276,071,494 |
| Supplier | Contracts count | Contracts volume (Kč) |
|---|---|---|
|
AGILE spol. s r.o. |
5 | 64,358,511 |
|
EP ENERGY TRADING, a.s. |
4 | 29,676,054 |
|
Pražská plynárenská, a.s. |
5 | 25,597,437 |
|
EUROVIA CS, a.s. |
1 | 18,744,270 |
|
PROFISTAV Litomyšl, a.s. |
1 | 14,222,385 |
|
RYDO, spol. s r.o. |
7 | 14,016,431 |
|
Slovenské elektrárne Česká republika, s.r.o. |
2 | 12,468,510 |
|
DS INTEX s.r.o. |
4 | 9,602,974 |
|
KOZEL-STAVBY s.r.o. |
1 | 8,656,536 |
|
FORAGRI s.r.o. |
1 | 6,500,000 |
|
ELTODO OSVĚTLENÍ, s.r.o. |
2 | 5,784,109 |
|
ACP Engineering s.r.o. |
1 | 5,568,448 |
|
MOUDER s.r.o. |
1 | 5,396,175 |
|
JRK Česká republika s.r.o. |
1 | 5,020,000 |
|
Ján Mucha |
1 | 4,489,287 |
|
ZRUP Příbram a.s. |
1 | 4,486,858 |
|
Vladimír Ureš |
4 | 3,563,598 |
|
CENTROPOL ENERGY, a.s. |
2 | 3,281,040 |
|
Řeznictví Sloupnice s.r.o. |
3 | 2,892,960 |
|
ČSOB Pojišťovna, a. s., člen holdingu ČSOB |
1 | 2,847,501 |
|
Sefir s.r.o. |
2 | 2,471,570 |
|
Lumius, spol. s r.o. |
1 | 2,372,058 |
|
AUTO VINKLER, s.r.o. |
1 | 2,241,683 |
|
XC tech s.r.o. |
1 | 2,189,500 |
|
AQUEKO, spol. s r.o. |
1 | 2,070,200 |
|
Atelier KK architekti s.r.o. |
1 | 2,052,700 |
|
Eko Bi s.r.o. |
2 | 2,016,764 |
|
Bidfood Czech Republic s.r.o. |
4 | 1,683,125 |
|
ELEKTRO ŠUDOMA, s.r.o. |
2 | 1,681,287 |
|
Jiří Procházka |
3 | 1,502,626 |
|
T-Mobile Czech Republic a.s. |
1 | 1,478,879 |
|
Ing. Petr Skopal |
4 | 1,424,540 |
|
CUBESPACE s.r.o. |
1 | 1,256,425 |
|
W.H.A. system, spol. s r. o. |
1 | 1,049,000 |
|
ELEKTRO-FLEXI s.r.o. |
1 | 942,719 |
|
SAMAB PRESS GROUP, a.s. |
1 | 789,000 |
|
EXVER FOOD, s.r.o. |
2 | 760,874 |
|
TROCKENBAU-Vereš s.r.o. |
1 | 747,953 |
|
JD Dlouhý, s.r.o. |
1 | 703,800 |
|
Pavel Brindzák |
2 | 604,728 |
|
TEZA, s. r. o. |
1 | 578,510 |
|
GASTRO komplet UO s.r.o. |
1 | 548,791 |
|
REKLAMA CENTRUM, spol. s r.o. |
2 | 469,691 |
|
DINO TRADING spol. s r.o. |
1 | 462,486 |
|
HAITECO CZ s.r.o. |
1 | 429,000 |
|
Kubík a.s. |
2 | 425,482 |
|
RSM CZ a.s. |
1 | 399,860 |
|
Chameleos s.r.o |
1 | 397,744 |
|
David Skalický |
1 | 390,000 |
|
Koncept s.r.o. |
1 | 388,957 |
|
Damaris Solutions s.r.o. |
1 | 385,000 |
|
Martin Buchl |
1 | 376,857 |
|
CBA NUGET s.r.o. |
1 | 368,140 |
|
Netfox s.r.o. |
1 | 365,904 |
|
Zdeněk Němec |
1 | 362,906 |
|
BON-CAR Svitavy, s.r.o. |
1 | 354,901 |
|
Jindřich Schlesinger |
1 | 349,699 |
|
R ALTRA spol. s r.o. |
1 | 345,290 |
|
OLFIN Car s.r.o. |
1 | 339,917 |
|
H-FLOOR s.r.o. |
1 | 322,908 |
|
Prosto interiér s.r.o. |
1 | 310,661 |
|
KANONA a.s. |
1 | 309,190 |
|
TOPSOFT JKM spol. s r.o. |
1 | 300,592 |
|
PAPERA s.r.o. |
1 | 298,907 |
|
Bc. Michal Smejkal |
1 | 266,185 |
|
ARBOTYL s.r.o. |
1 | 228,186 |
|
Petr Kostka |
1 | 165,610 |
|
KOVO, výrobní družstvo |
1 | 162,005 |
|
Mgr. Karel Kubišta |
2 | 156,399 |
|
MARELL s.r.o. |
1 | 150,350 |
Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools? detailed info
| Tool | Contracts count |
|---|---|
| Extended deadlines | 0% (0 from 2) |
| Nonprice competition | 0% (0 from 17) |
| Division into lots | 6% (1 from 17) |
| E-auction and DPS | 0% (0 from 17) |
| Innovative procedure | 0% (0 from 17) |
What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law? detailed info
| Purchases | Volume (Kč) |
|---|---|
| Public procurement | 259,638,543 |
| Small scale tenders | 250,807,354 |
| Unregulated purchases | 435,649,878 |
| Total | 946,095,775 |
| Budget item | Objem prostredku Kč |
|---|---|
| Durable property purchases | 441,437,692 |
| Material consumption | 9,178,317 |
| Energy consumption | 8,186,132 |
| Other consumption | 0 |
| Sold goods | 88,422 |
| Activation of durable property | 0 |
| Activation of consumable property | 0 |
| Change of stock | 0 |
| Maintenance and repairs | 172,956,471 |
| Travel costs | 1,592,197 |
| Representation costs | 5,774,406 |
| In-house services | 0 |
| Other services | 291,292,567 |
| Small long-term property costs | 8,414,647 |
| Other costs | 7,174,926 |
Did buyer violate law significantly? detailed info
How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures? detailed info
Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications? detailed info
Does buyer publish vital data in official journal? detailed info
| Type of flaw | Contracts count |
|---|---|
| Bidders count not published | 0% (0 from 24) |
| Procedure type not published | 0% (0 from 24) |
| Missing buyer ID | 0% (0 from 24) |
| Missing call for tenders | 0% (0 from 24) |
| Missing winning price | 0% (0 from 24) |
| Contract modification by more than 50 % | 4% (1 from 24) |
| Contract | Type of discrepancy |
|---|---|
| Singletrack Glacensis – nástupní místo Peklák | Contract modification by more than 50 % |
Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements? detailed info
| Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? | 100% (zakázek z 24 ve Věstníku) | ||||||||||||
| Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? | 1.08 (average mistakes per contract) | ||||||||||||
| Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 24 tenders under the law) |
|
Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally? detailed info
Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.