Small cities • 2022 • past ranking

Město Česká Třebová

IČO 00278653

Data on buyer profile have relatively good quality. Buyer does not use tools to support competition.

70.
ranking
73%
zIndex
Show average values  
54%
Bidder participation
80%
Winner concentration
6%
Pro-competitive tools
73%
Public procurement share on total purchases
100%
Legal misconduct
100%
Competitive contracting
60%
Consistent conduct
99%
Journal data quality
73%
Buyer profile data quality
80%
Supplier feedback

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

54%
average 51%
Largest contracts
Industry 		Bids
Kompostárna Třebovice
Engineering works and construction works
4
Ø4 in industry
Rekonstrukce chodníků podél silnice I/14 v České Třebové, realizace úseku č. 2
Installation works of walkways
1
Ø4 in industry
Zateplení Mateřské školy Habrmanova, Česká Třebová
Construction work for kindergarten buildings
2
Ø4 in industry
Singletrack Glacensis – nástupní místo Peklák
Construction work
1
Ø4 in industry
Cyklostezka Česká Třebová - Rybník
Cycle path construction work
6
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

80%
average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
AGILE spol. s r.o.
 5 64,358,511
EP ENERGY TRADING, a.s.
 4 29,676,054
Pražská plynárenská, a.s.
 5 25,597,437
EUROVIA CS, a.s.
 1 18,744,270
PROFISTAV Litomyšl, a.s.
 1 14,222,385
Other suppliers 108 276,071,494

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

6%
average 27%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 2)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 17)
Division into lots 6% (1 from 17)
E-auction 0% (0 from 17)
Innovative procedure 0% (0 from 17)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

73%
average 68%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 259,638,543
Small scale tenders 250,807,354
Unregulated purchases 435,649,878
Total 946,095,775

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 87%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

60%
average 60%
Average values displayed

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

99%
average 98%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 24)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 24)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 24)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 24)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 24)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 4% (1 from 24)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

73%
average 49%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 100% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.08 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 24 tenders under the law)
0-250K 9 tenders
250K-500K 34 tenders
500K-1000K 16 tenders
1000K+ 21 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

80%
average 81%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.