Small cities • 2022 • past ranking

Město Kadaň

IČO 00261912

Buyer recieves unusually small ammount of bids. Large volume of money is spent without open competition.

Show average values  
9%
Bidder participation
66%
Winner concentration
20%
Pro-competitive tools
60%
Public procurement share on total purchases
100%
Legal misconduct
60%
Competitive contracting
60%
Consistent conduct
95%
Journal data quality
70%
Buyer profile data quality
80%
Supplier feedback

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

9%
average 51%
Largest contracts
Industry 		Bids
Stavební úpravy provozní budovy a mobilní zastřešení plaveckého bazénu 50m, Letní koupaliště Kadaň - stavební práce na provozní budově
Construction work
3
Ø4 in industry
Kadaň – zklidnění dopravy, ul. Na Podlesí
Construction work for highways, roads
1
Ø5 in industry
Kadaň _ zklidnění dopravy, ul. Na Podlesí
Construction work for highways, roads
1
Ø5 in industry
Revitalizace parkánů 1. a 2. segment včetně úpravy nádvoří u hradu
Construction work
3
Ø4 in industry
Stavební úpravy provozní budovy a mobilní zastřešení plaveckého bazénu 50m, Letní koupaliště Kadaň - výstavba nafukovací haly
Building construction work
1
Ø3 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

66%
average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
PETROM STAVBY, a.s.
 12 41,083,816
Silnice Topolany a.s.
 7 39,754,061
FRK s.r.o.
 8 32,431,894
BAGROS s.r.o.
 9 16,150,460
Bauvant s.r.o.
 12 15,410,182
Other suppliers 64 147,625,738

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

20%
average 27%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 2)
Nonprice competition 10% (2 from 20)
Division into lots 10% (2 from 20)
E-auction 0% (0 from 20)
Innovative procedure 0% (0 from 20)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

60%
average 68%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 179,678,365
Small scale tenders 144,354,503
Unregulated purchases 590,570,366
Total 914,603,234

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

60%
average 87%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication 		Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Nákup elektrické energie v hladině nízkého napětí na období od 1. 1. 2022 do 30. 6. 2022
Emergency 		- 8,627,975
Stavební úpravy provozní budovy a mobilní zastřešení plaveckého bazénu 50m, Letní koupaliště Kadaň
Contract modification 		25,900,797 3,904,664 (+16%)
Sociální byty - č.p. 265 Prunéřov
Contract modification 		8,699,453 723,448 (+9%)
Kadaň - úprava prostranství v okolí Prioru
Contract modification 		4,587,769 616,317 (+14%)
Využití srážkových vod u 3. ZŠ (Sluníčková)
Contract modification 		2,846,041 594,185 (+21%)

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

60%
average 60%
Average values displayed

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

95%
average 98%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 21)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 21)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 21)
Missing call for tenders 5% (1 from 21)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 21)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 21)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

70%
average 49%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 95% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.38 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 21 tenders under the law)
0-250K 2 tenders
250K-500K 5 tenders
500K-1000K 18 tenders
1000K+ 30 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

80%
average 81%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.