Small cities • 2022 • past ranking

Město Kadaň

IČO 00261912

Buyer recieves unusually small ammount of bids. Large volume of money is spent without open competition.

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

9%
average 51%

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

66%
average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
PETROM STAVBY, a.s.
12 41,083,816
Silnice Topolany a.s.
7 39,754,061
FRK s.r.o.
8 32,431,894
BAGROS s.r.o.
9 16,150,460
Bauvant s.r.o.
12 15,410,182
Other suppliers 64 147,625,738

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

20%
average 27%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 2)
Nonprice competition 10% (2 from 20)
Division into lots 10% (2 from 20)
E-auction 0% (0 from 20)
Innovative procedure 0% (0 from 20)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

60%
average 68%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 179,678,365
Small scale tenders 144,354,503
Unregulated purchases 590,570,366
Total 914,603,234

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

60%
average 87%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Nákup elektrické energie v hladině nízkého napětí na období od 1. 1. 2022 do 30. 6. 2022
Emergency
- 8,627,975
Stavební úpravy provozní budovy a mobilní zastřešení plaveckého bazénu 50m, Letní koupaliště Kadaň
Contract modification
25,900,797 3,904,664 (+16%)
Sociální byty - č.p. 265 Prunéřov
Contract modification
8,699,453 723,448 (+9%)
Kadaň - úprava prostranství v okolí Prioru
Contract modification
4,587,769 616,317 (+14%)
Využití srážkových vod u 3. ZŠ (Sluníčková)
Contract modification
2,846,041 594,185 (+21%)

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

60%
average 60%
Average values displayed

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

95%
average 98%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 21)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 21)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 21)
Missing call for tenders 5% (1 from 21)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 21)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 21)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

70%
average 49%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 95% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.38 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 21 tenders under the law)
0-250K 2 tenders
250K-500K 5 tenders
500K-1000K 18 tenders
1000K+ 30 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

80%
average 81%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.