Small cities • 2022 • past ranking

Město Třeboň

IČO 00247618

Good buyer. Large volume of money is spent without open competition. Buyer divides contracts into lots to foster participation of SME's

39.
ranking
75%
zIndex

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

64%
average 51%

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

96%
average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Metrostav DIZ s.r.o.
1 75,989,061
Metrostav a.s.
2 56,810,179
PAMÁTKY TÁBOR, s.r.o.
2 55,368,602
EUROVIA CS, a.s.
2 41,630,115
ČEZ ESCO, a.s.
1 36,590,937
Other suppliers 61 442,525,319

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

51%
average 27%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 20% (1 from 5)
Nonprice competition 28% (5 from 18)
Division into lots 0% (0 from 18)
E-auction 11% (2 from 18)
Innovative procedure 0% (0 from 18)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

75%
average 68%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 481,533,971
Small scale tenders 122,386,545
Unregulated purchases 464,644,020
Total 1,068,564,535

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

58%
average 87%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Třeboň, Branná - ČOV a kanalizace (1. a 2. etapa)
Contract modification
75,989,061 8,712,588 (+12%)
Rozšíření wellness centra lázní Aurora
Contract modification
109,489,205 6,738,400 (+7%)
Aktivní turistická zóna u Světa - 2. etapa - aktivity park
Contract modification
18,500,971 3,553,140 (+20%)
Revitalizace prostranství Na Rybníčku v Třeboni
Contract modification
17,363,075 2,953,468 (+18%)
Bertiny lázně Třeboň – stavební akce 2019/20 – vyhrazená změna závazku
Additional works
23,581,838 1,377,799 (+6%)

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

60%
average 60%

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 98%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 19)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 19)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 19)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 19)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 19)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 19)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

68%
average 49%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 89% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.47 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 19 tenders under the law)
0-250K 2 tenders
250K-500K 4 tenders
500K-1000K 23 tenders
1000K+ 22 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

80%
average 81%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.