Small cities • 2022 • past ranking

Město Jičín

IČO 00271632

Good buyer. Data on buyer profile have relatively good quality. Buyer supports competition by providing extended deadlines for tender submissions.

39.
ranking
75%
zIndex

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

57%
average 51%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Kasárna Jičín, výstavba dopravní a technické infrastruktury a veřejných prostranství
Construction work
4
Ø4 in industry
Rekonstrukce Denního stacionáře domovinky Hofmanova čp. 568, Jičín
Construction work
6
Ø4 in industry
Stavební úpravy a změna užívání objektu čestného dvora v Jičíně - III. etapa
Construction work for art and cultural buildings
2
Ø2 in industry
Rekonstrukce půdních prostor nad přístavbou ZŠ Husova - stavební práce a nábytek
Construction work
5
Ø4 in industry
Provozování MHD v Jičíně
Public road transport services
2
Ø3 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

93%
average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Stavoka Kosice, a.s.
1 89,283,099
EUROVIA CS, a.s.
1 89,283,099
RITUS s.r.o.
4 57,475,715
VALC, s.r.o.
1 29,720,442
M-SILNICE a.s.
4 24,068,590
Other suppliers 79 432,446,157

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

37%
average 27%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 33% (1 from 3)
Nonprice competition 10% (3 from 29)
Division into lots 0% (0 from 29)
E-auction 0% (0 from 29)
Innovative procedure 3% (1 from 29)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

75%
average 68%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 405,113,573
Small scale tenders 106,214,166
Unregulated purchases 390,855,086
Total 902,182,825

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

81%
average 87%

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

60%
average 60%
Average values displayed

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

99%
average 98%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 31)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 31)
Missing buyer ID 3% (1 from 31)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 31)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 31)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 31)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

69%
average 49%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 97% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.03 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 31 tenders under the law)
0-250K 12 tenders
250K-500K 13 tenders
500K-1000K 15 tenders
1000K+ 12 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

80%
average 81%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.