Small cities • 2022 • past ranking

Město Nový Bydžov

IČO 00269247

Considerable volume of contracts goes only to few firms. Buyer profile has high number of errors.

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

average 51%
Largest contracts
Sanace staré ekologické zátěže v areálu bývalého podniku Kovoplast a sousedním intravilánu města Nový Bydžov
Environmental services
Ø2 in industry
Sanace staré ekologické zátěže v areálu bývalého podniku Kovoplast a sousedním intravilánu města Nový Bydžov - druhé kolo - podání nabídek
Buyer profile data - no industry specification
Ø2 in industry
Rekonstrukce ulice Husova třída v Novém Bydžově
Construction work
Ø4 in industry
Rekonstrukce ulice F. Palackého v Novém Bydžově
Construction work
Ø4 in industry
Rekonstrukce ulice J. E. Purkyně v Novém Bydžově
Construction work
Ø4 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
G-servis Praha spol. s r.o.
2 151,838,040
2 26,837,541
MATEX HK s.r.o.
2 17,365,116
PORR a.s.
1 8,822,939
AGRICO, s.r.o.
1 4,190,000
Other suppliers 5 170,683,156

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

average 68%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 192,634,972
Small scale tenders 75,919,020
Unregulated purchases 230,059,747
Total 498,613,739

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

average 87%
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Sanace staré ekologické zátěže v areálu bývalého podniku Kovoplast a sousedním intravilánu města Nový Bydžov
Contract modification
75,919,020 653,596 (+1%)

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

average 60%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 17%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0
Average decision length 87.60 days

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

average 98%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 13)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 13)
Missing buyer ID 8% (1 from 13)
Missing call for tenders 8% (1 from 13)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 13)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 13)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

average 49%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 50% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.00 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 12 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 1 tender

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

average 81%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.