Small cities • 2022 • past ranking

Město Humpolec

IČO 00248266

Buyer does not use tools to support competition. Buyer recieves unusually small ammount of bids.

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

average 51%
Largest contracts
Rekonstrukce zimního stadionu Humpolec
Construction work
Ø4 in industry
Polyfunkční komunitní centrum Humpolec
Construction work
Ø4 in industry
Rekonstrukce komunikací ulic Masarykova a 5. května, Humpolec
Construction work for highways, roads
Ø5 in industry
Stavební úpravy ulice U Stadionu, Humpolec
Construction work for highways, roads
Ø5 in industry
Rekonstrukce komunikace ul. Jihlavská, Humpolec
Construction work for highways, roads
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
H + H TECHNIKA, spol. s r.o.
1 35,987,192
ACG-Real s.r.o.
1 26,694,224
2 25,500,895
Chládek a Tintěra Havlíčkův Brod, a.s.
2 15,596,972
SWIETELSKY stavební s.r.o.
2 12,043,020
Other suppliers 17 86,073,018

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

average 27%

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

average 68%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 227,667,403
Small scale tenders 76,663,210
Unregulated purchases 740,871,705
Total 1,045,202,318

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

average 87%
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Polyfunkční komunitní centrum Humpolec
Contract modification
26,694,224 5,068,348 (+19%)

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

average 60%
Average values displayed

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

average 98%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 11)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 11)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 11)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 11)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 11)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 11)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

average 49%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 100% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.91 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 11 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 1 tender
500K-1000K 1 tender
1000K+ 9 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

average 81%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.