Small cities • 2022 • past ranking

Město Jirkov

IČO 00261904

Applicants are discouraged by frequent competition modifications and cancellations. Buyer profile is in relatively good shape.

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

average 51%

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
1 49,298,340
5 37,981,596
4 33,582,018
AMP Chomutov a.s.
2 11,051,395
PULSKLIMA, spol. s r.o.
2 8,434,219
Other suppliers 63 201,616,486

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

average 27%

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

average 68%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 243,414,066
Small scale tenders 129,130,628
Unregulated purchases 674,275,058
Total 1,046,819,751

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

average 87%
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Rekonstrukce vzduchotechnického zařízení pro kuchyň a jídelnu objektu 2.ZŠ Jirkov ul. Studentská 1427
Contract modification
3,654,126 987,823 (+28%)

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

average 60%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 20%
Cancelled contracts 40%
Average requirements modifications count 0.60
Average decision length 64.67 days

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

average 98%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 19)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 19)
Missing buyer ID 11% (2 from 19)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 19)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 19)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 19)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

average 49%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 89% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.28 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 18 tenders under the law)
0-250K 6 tenders
250K-500K 10 tenders
500K-1000K 18 tenders
1000K+ 21 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

average 81%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.