Small cities • 2022 • past ranking

Město Bílovec

IČO 00297755

Data on buyer profile have relatively good quality. Buyer recieves unusually small ammount of bids.

70.
ranking
73%
zIndex

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

36%
average 51%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Bílovec bez bariér II. - rekonstrukce pěších komunikací na ul. Čs. armády (2019)
Construction work
8
Ø4 in industry
Výměna svítidel veřejného osvětlení ve městě Bílovec - 2. etapa
Installation of outdoor illumination equipment
3
Ø5 in industry
Výměna svítidel veřejného osvětlení ve městě Bílovec
Buyer profile data - no industry specification
4
Ø2 in industry
Rekonstrukce a modernizace budov ZŠ a MŠ Bílovec, Komenského 701/3, příspěvková organizace
Construction work
4
Ø4 in industry
Expozice středověku v suterénu zámku, Zámecká č. p. 660, Bílovec
Buyer profile data - no industry specification
2
Ø2 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

92%
average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Moravia Trend s.r.o.
3 8,898,993
Václav Dostál
6 8,491,257
VYKI TOOLS GROUP s.r.o.
5 6,760,000
ReSpol s.r.o.
1 5,734,014
Ivo Karkoška
4 5,688,784
Other suppliers 64 82,642,700

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

37%
average 27%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 0)
Nonprice competition 17% (1 from 6)
Division into lots 33% (2 from 6)
E-auction 0% (0 from 6)
Innovative procedure 0% (0 from 6)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

59%
average 68%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 63,333,942
Small scale tenders 123,091,500
Unregulated purchases 346,163,169
Total 532,588,611

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 87%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

60%
average 60%
Average values displayed

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

96%
average 98%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 6)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 6)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 6)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 6)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 6)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 17% (1 from 6)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

67%
average 49%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 50% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.50 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 6 tenders under the law)
0-250K 12 tenders
250K-500K 5 tenders
500K-1000K 20 tenders
1000K+ 25 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

80%
average 81%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.