Small cities • 2022

Město Nové Město nad Metují

IČO 00272876

Large volume of money is spent without open competition. Data on buyer profile have relatively good quality.

51.
ranking
74%
zIndex

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

58%
average 51%

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

97%
average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Marius Pedersen a.s.
1 19,843,166
STATING s.r.o.
1 13,898,274
STAVIX s.r.o.
4 9,699,005
NOVOSTAV s. r. o.
2 9,597,725
STAVIBET s.r.o.
2 6,169,987
Other suppliers 57 107,812,695

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

27%
average 27%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 1)
Nonprice competition 21% (3 from 14)
Division into lots 0% (0 from 14)
E-auction 7% (1 from 14)
Innovative procedure 0% (0 from 14)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

68%
average 68%
Average values displayed

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

58%
average 87%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Dodávka zemního plynu společné zadávání pro sdružené zadavatele
Outside directive scope
- 5,139,396
Komplexní pojištění majetku města
Outside directive scope
- 3,143,532
Vybudování učebny přírodovědných předmětů, IT učebny v ZŠ Krčín Nové Město nad Metují – vybavení nábytkem
Contract modification
455,071 17,380 (+4%)

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

60%
average 60%
Average values displayed

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

98%
average 98%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 16)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 16)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 16)
Missing call for tenders 6% (1 from 16)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 16)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 16)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

72%
average 49%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 88% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.63 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 16 tenders under the law)
0-250K 9 tenders
250K-500K 11 tenders
500K-1000K 10 tenders
1000K+ 19 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

100%
average 81%

Buyer did receive excellent feedback from its tender participants.