Government • 2015

Úřad vlády České republiky

IČO 00006599

Good buyer. Buyer profile is in relatively good shape. Procurement jounal notices do not contain many mistakes.

2.
ranking
77%
zIndex

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

67%
average 61%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Služby mobilního operátora
Mobilní telefonní služby
3
Ø2 in industry
Zajištění softwarové a hardwarové podpory Informačního systému výzkumu, experimentálního vývoje a inovací
Služby informačních technologií
1
Ø1 in industry
Stravovací služby
Služby závodních jídelen a zabezpečování pohostinských služeb pro zákazníky
7
Ø3 in industry
Modernizace ODok (včetně předimplementační analýzy)
Informační technologie: poradenství, vývoj programového vybavení, internet a podpora
1
Ø2 in industry
Poskytování služeb k ekonomickému systému SAP
Informační technologie: poradenství, vývoj programového vybavení, internet a podpora
5
Ø2 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

79%
average 68%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
O2 Czech Republic a.s.
1 42,350,400
Infoscience Praha s.r.o.
1 30,600,000
Eurest, spol. s r.o.
1 16,175,799
Sysnet s.r.o.
1 14,788,800
itelligence, a.s.
1 10,924,000
Other suppliers 48 71,225,361

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

79%
average 78%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (1 from 0)
Nonprice competition 14% (1 from 7)
Division into lots 0% (0 from 7)
E-auction 0% (0 from 7)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 7)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

53%
average 56%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 188,010,618
Small scale tenders 0
Unregulated purchases 490,696,577
Total 678,707,195

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

72%
average 61%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
hlavní vědecký poradce
Not disclosed
- 5,280,000
Provedení výpočtů za rok 2013 dle platné Metodiky hodnocení výsledků výzkumných organizací a hodnocení výsledků ukončených programů
Not disclosed
- 2,600,000
hlavní vědecký poradce
Not disclosed
- 2,530,000
poradenská činnost v oblasti public relations, public affairs, mediální politiky atd.
Not disclosed
- 1,740,000
Asistence v lokálním partnerství Ostrava
Krajní naléhavost
- 481,500

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

49%
average 58%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 15%
Cancelled contracts 41%
Average requirements modifications count 0.24

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

78%
average 55%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 8% (4 from 53)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 53)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 53)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 53)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 53)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 53)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

87%
average 32%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 95% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.34 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 0 tenders

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

96%
average 88%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 2% (1 from 53)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 53)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 53)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 53)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 53)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 53)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 6% (3 from 53)

Information provision

Has buyer answered our information request?   detailed info 

100%
average 56%

Full disclosure

Buyer responded within 15 days legal limit.