State-owned enterprises • 2022 • past ranking

Vojenské lesy a statky Čr, s.p.

IČO 00000205

Good buyer. Competitions are open to multiple bidders. Buyer does not modify or cancel tenders which fosters competition.

7.
ranking
76%
Zindex

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

62%
average 47%

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

81%
average 83%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
LESCUS Cetkovice, s.r.o.
27 536,092,280
RM FOREST lesní společnost s.r.o.
4 405,429,300
Kloboucká lesní s.r.o.
3 374,971,242
EUROPROLAND s.r.o.
4 244,351,875
TIS lignum s.r.o.
2 181,062,500
Other suppliers 783 1,532,247,049

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

42%
average 37%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 4% (4 from 96)
Nonprice competition 12% (18 from 156)
Division into lots 54% (84 from 156)
E-auction and DPS 6% (10 from 156)
Innovative procedure 0% (0 from 156)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

98%
average 76%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Zakázka v rámci DNS - Dodávky OOPP pro Vojenské lesy a statky ČR, s. p. na rok 2020/2021
Outside directive scope
- 4,196,790
Želnavský smyk
Contract modification
36,941,877 3,490,406 (+10%)
Zakázka v rámci DNS - Dodávky OOPP pro Vojenské lesy a statky ČR, s. p. na rok 2020/2021
Outside directive scope
- 3,183,158
Zakázka v rámci DNS - Dodávky OOPP pro Vojenské lesy a statky ČR, s. p. na rok 2020/2021
Outside directive scope
- 3,050,450
Expediční a skladová hala Lhota
Contract modification
22,988,015 2,710,850 (+12%)

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

76%
average 60%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 2%
Cancelled contracts 6%
Average requirements modifications count 0.64
Average decision length 78.67 days

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

99%
average 96%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 1% (2 from 165)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 165)
Missing buyer ID 2% (3 from 165)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 165)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 165)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 165)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

53%
average 44%
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 93% (zakázek z 144 ve Věstníku)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.19 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 144 tenders under the law)
0 - 250k Kč 6 zakázek
250k - 500k Kč 3 zakázek
500k - 1m Kč 5 zakázek
more than 1mil Kč 85 zakázek

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

100%
average 91%

Buyer did receive excellent feedback from its tender participants.