Small cities • 2022 • past ranking

Město Dačice

IČO 00246476

Buyer does not avoid following procurement law. Buyer profile is in relatively good shape.

70.
ranking
73%
zIndex

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

49%
average 51%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
VÝBĚR PROVOZOVATELE VODOHOSPODÁŘSKÉ INFRASTRUKTURY (KANALIZACE) VE VLASTNICTVÍ MĚSTA DAČICE
Buyer profile data - no industry specification
2
Ø2 in industry
Rekonstrukce místních komunikací na sídlišti k Hradišťku, I. etapa
Works for complete or part construction and civil engineering work
3
Ø4 in industry
Výstavba ZTV Za Školou, II. etapa
Works for complete or part construction and civil engineering work
4
Ø4 in industry
Přístavba učeben ZŠ Komenského v Dačicích
Construction work for school buildings
6
Ø4 in industry
Víceúčelová plocha v areálu sportovního stadionu v Dačicích
Construction work for sports facilities
1
Ø3 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

83%
average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
ČEVAK a.s.
1 101,465,000
SATES ČECHY s.r.o.
6 89,070,847
STARKON a.s.
1 31,462,239
AV MEDIA, a.s.
5 19,665,771
BaP holding a.s.
1 13,934,084
Other suppliers 53 232,891,382

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

18%
average 27%

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

83%
average 68%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 165,415,601
Small scale tenders 219,663,439
Unregulated purchases 171,278,241
Total 556,357,282

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

93%
average 87%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Přístavba učeben ZŠ Komenského v Dačicích
Contract modification
31,462,239 3,007,941 (+10%)

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

60%
average 60%
Average values displayed

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 98%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 11)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 11)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 11)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 11)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 11)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 11)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

62%
average 49%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 91% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.73 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 11 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 1 tender
500K-1000K 12 tenders
1000K+ 32 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

80%
average 81%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.