Government • 2015

Česká geologická služba

IČO 00025798

Good buyer. Buyer publishes without flaws in procurement journal. Competitions are open to multiple bidders.


Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

average 61%
Largest contracts
Průzkumné vrtné práce v Oblasti 3
Geologický, geofyzikální a jiný vědecký průzkum
Ø2 in industry
Průzkumné vrtné práce v Oblasti 1
Geologický, geofyzikální a jiný vědecký průzkum
Ø2 in industry
Průzkumné vrtné práce v Oblasti 2
Geologický, geofyzikální a jiný vědecký průzkum
Ø2 in industry
Geologické práce pro hydrogeologický průzkum Oblast 3
Oceánografické a hydrologické služby
Ø2 in industry
Karotážní práce v Oblastech 1 až 3
Karotážní měření zapažení vrtů
Ø2 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

average 68%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Baugeo, s.r.o.
3 82,426,796
Vodní Zdroje, a.s.
2 53,935,075
Aquatest a.s.
3 48,910,580
Geotest, a.s.
3 15,368,000
Geophysik GGD mbH
0 13,048,420
Other suppliers 20 64,165,422

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

average 78%

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

average 56%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 278,811,673
Small scale tenders 0
Unregulated purchases 323,298,252
Total 602,109,926

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

average 61%
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Podniková licence na software Esri
Not disclosed
- 7,000,000

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

average 58%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 4%
Cancelled contracts 40%
Average requirements modifications count 0.15

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

average 55%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 32)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 32)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 32)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 32)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 32)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 32)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

average 32%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 68% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.67 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 0 tenders

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

average 88%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 3% (1 from 32)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 16% (5 from 32)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 3% (1 from 32)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 32)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 32)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 32)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 12% (4 from 32)

Information provision

Has buyer answered our information request?   detailed info 

average 56%

No response

Buyer did not reply within mandatory 15 days limit.