Good buyer. The competition for contracts is high. Buyer does not avoid following procurement law.
Is the level of competition satisfactory? detailed info
Largest contracts Industry |
Bids |
---|---|
Svoz a likvidace komunálního odpadu pro město Šenov - Svoz a likvidace komunálního odpadu pro město Šenov – část I
Refuse and waste related services |
2
Ø1 in industry |
ZATEPLENÍ 1. PAVILONU ZŠ ŠENOV
Construction work for school buildings |
7
Ø4 in industry |
Svoz a likvidace komunálního odpadu pro město Šenov - Svoz a likvidace komunálního odpadu pro město Šenov – část II
Refuse and waste related services |
2
Ø1 in industry |
REKONSTRUKCE ZUŠ VILÉMA WÜNSCHE, ŠENOV
Restoration work |
7
Ø3 in industry |
VENKOVNÍ SPORTOVIŠTĚ ZŠ STŘED V ŠENOVĚ
Construction work for sports facilities |
4
Ø4 in industry |
Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms? detailed info
Largest suppliers | Contracts count | Contracts volume Kč |
---|---|---|
OZO Ostrava s.r.o. |
2 | 34,258,736 |
MH - STAVBY, s.r.o. |
1 | 15,711,254 |
KAMI PROFIT, s.r.o., odštěpný závod |
1 | 10,447,860 |
SPORTOVNÍ PODLAHY ZLÍN, s.r.o. |
1 | 9,344,364 |
SDO Technika s.r.o. |
4 | 8,335,010 |
Other suppliers | 22 | 96,729,033 |
Supplier | Contracts count | Contracts volume (Kč) |
---|---|---|
OZO Ostrava s.r.o. |
2 | 34,258,736 |
MH - STAVBY, s.r.o. |
1 | 15,711,254 |
KAMI PROFIT, s.r.o., odštěpný závod |
1 | 10,447,860 |
SPORTOVNÍ PODLAHY ZLÍN, s.r.o. |
1 | 9,344,364 |
SDO Technika s.r.o. |
4 | 8,335,010 |
sport cité + s.r.o. |
1 | 7,996,387 |
Komunální technika, s.r.o. |
2 | 7,898,000 |
MATOSA PROFISTAV s.r.o. |
1 | 6,945,203 |
StavoSport s.r.o. |
1 | 5,767,640 |
ENIS Solutions s.r.o. |
2 | 4,882,854 |
Šenovská dopravní společnost, spol. s r.o. |
1 | 4,461,775 |
PROFIZA s.r.o. |
1 | 3,805,248 |
Sunritek s.r.o. |
1 | 3,265,882 |
Metrostav Infrastructure a.s. |
1 | 3,172,746 |
STASPO, spol. s r.o. |
1 | 2,256,142 |
Frýdecká skládka, a.s. |
2 | 1,740,331 |
STROMMY COMPANY s.r.o. |
2 | 1,703,447 |
Auto Hruška s.r.o. |
1 | 1,449,981 |
EURO SPONZOR, s.r.o. |
1 | 1,179,000 |
ZAHRADY R+R - realizace a údržba zahrad s.r.o. |
1 | 1,138,867 |
Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools? detailed info
Tool | Contracts count |
---|---|
Extended deadlines | 0% (0 from 2) |
Nonprice competition | 0% (0 from 17) |
Division into lots | 24% (4 from 17) |
E-auction | 0% (0 from 17) |
Innovative procedure | 0% (0 from 17) |
What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law? detailed info
Purchases | Volume (Kč) |
---|---|
Public procurement | 143,541,847 |
Small scale tenders | 13,414,013 |
Unregulated purchases | 42,496,772 |
Total | 199,452,632 |
Budget item | Objem prostredku Kč |
---|---|
Durable property purchases | 74,543,740 |
Material consumption | 15,451,210 |
Energy consumption | 6,297,000 |
Other consumption | 917,923 |
Sold goods | 48,986 |
Activation of durable property | 0 |
Activation of consumable property | 0 |
Change of stock | 0 |
Maintenance and repairs | 19,231,219 |
Travel costs | 122,199 |
Representation costs | 387,217 |
In-house services | 0 |
Other services | 76,335,946 |
Small long-term property costs | 4,243,549 |
Other costs | 1,873,642 |
Did buyer violate law significantly? detailed info
How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures? detailed info
Contract Reason for negotiated procedure without publication |
Original contract (Kč) | Contract modification / NPWP (Kč) |
---|---|---|
ZATEPLENÍ 1. PAVILONU ZŠ ŠENOV Contract modification |
15,711,254 | 1,685,707 (+11%) |
REKONSTRUKCE ZUŠ VILÉMA WÜNSCHE, ŠENOV Contract modification |
10,447,860 | 1,214,987 (+12%) |
Oprava střechy a zateplení ZŠ Šenov - Podlesí Contract modification |
6,945,203 | 948,074 (+14%) |
VENKOVNÍ SPORTOVIŠTĚ ZŠ STŘED V ŠENOVĚ Contract modification |
9,344,364 | 607,784 (+7%) |
VENKOVNÍ SPORTOVIŠTĚ ZŠ ŠENOV-PODLESÍ Contract modification |
7,996,387 | 405,169 (+6%) |
Contract Reason for negotiated procedure without publication |
Original contract (Kč) | Contract modification / NPWP (Kč) |
---|---|---|
ZATEPLENÍ 1. PAVILONU ZŠ ŠENOV Contract modification |
15,711,254 | 1,685,707 (+11%) |
REKONSTRUKCE ZUŠ VILÉMA WÜNSCHE, ŠENOV Contract modification |
10,447,860 | 1,214,987 (+12%) |
Oprava střechy a zateplení ZŠ Šenov - Podlesí Contract modification |
6,945,203 | 948,074 (+14%) |
VENKOVNÍ SPORTOVIŠTĚ ZŠ STŘED V ŠENOVĚ Contract modification |
9,344,364 | 607,784 (+7%) |
VENKOVNÍ SPORTOVIŠTĚ ZŠ ŠENOV-PODLESÍ Contract modification |
7,996,387 | 405,169 (+6%) |
Výstavba sběrného dvora Šenov Contract modification |
4,461,775 | 257,874 (+6%) |
VÍCEÚČELOVÁ HRACÍ PLOCHA SK LAPAČKA Contract modification |
5,767,640 | 113,168 (+2%) |
Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications? detailed info
Does buyer publish vital data in official journal? detailed info
Type of flaw | Contracts count |
---|---|
Bidders count not published | 0% (0 from 17) |
Procedure type not published | 0% (0 from 17) |
Missing buyer ID | 0% (0 from 17) |
Missing call for tenders | 0% (0 from 17) |
Missing winning price | 0% (0 from 17) |
Contract modification by more than 50 % | 6% (1 from 17) |
Contract | Type of flaw |
---|---|
Výsadba zeleně-Město Šenov | Contract modification by more than 50 % |
Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements? detailed info
Check | Result | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? | 94% (contracts) | ||||||||||||
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? | 0.24 (average mistakes per contract) | ||||||||||||
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 17 tenders under the law) |
|
Contract | Type of flaw |
---|---|
Svoz a likvidace odpadu pro město Šenov - sběrný dvůr | Tender not found on any profile |
VENKOVNÍ SPORTOVIŠTĚ ZŠ ŠENOV-PODLESÍ | Payment information missing |
Revitalizace veřejného osvětlení města Šenov v dotačním programu EFEKT 2020 - III. etapa | Price inconsistent with Journal |
Svoz a likvidace komunálního odpadu pro město Šenov | Price inconsistent with Journal |
Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally? detailed info
Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.