Government • 2015

Energetický regulační úřad

IČO 70894451

Buyer profile is in relatively good shape. Procurement journal misses vital information (prices, suppliers..).

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

39%
average 61%

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

74%
average 68%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Advokátní kancelář Kříž a partneři s.r.o.
2 6,400,000
Canon Cz s.r.o.
1 5,515,484
Jšk, advokátní kancelář, s.r.o.
1 3,200,000
Amper Market, a.s.
1 3,104,325
Autocont Cz a.s.
1 2,044,854
Other suppliers 8 7,341,755

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

50%
average 78%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 0)
Nonprice competition 100% (1 from 1)
Division into lots 0% (0 from 1)
E-auction 0% (0 from 1)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 1)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

43%
average 56%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 27,606,419
Small scale tenders 0
Unregulated purchases 122,627,429
Total 150,233,848

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

59%
average 61%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
„Rozšíření licence informačního systému“
Not disclosed
- 2,044,854
Poskytování datových a hlasových služeb 1
Not disclosed
- 1,239,669
Poskytování datových a hlasových služeb 2
Not disclosed
- 165,289

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

50%
average 58%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 50%
Average requirements modifications count 0.50

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

22%
average 55%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 7% (1 from 14)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 14)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 14)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 14)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 14)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 14)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

70%
average 32%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 77% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.39 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 0 tenders

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

78%
average 88%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 14)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 14)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 14)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 14)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 14)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 14)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 43% (6 from 14)

Information provision

Has buyer answered our information request?   detailed info 

0%
average 56%

No response

Buyer did not reply within mandatory 15 days limit.