Government • 2015

Centrum služeb pro silniční dopravu

IČO 70898219

There are not many contract extensions and ammendments. Procurement jounal notices do not contain many mistakes.

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

44%
average 61%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Zajištění výroby chráněných tiskovin
Ceniny
4
Ø4 in industry
Nákup motivačních předmětů BESIP
Informační a propagační výrobky
4
Ø4 in industry
Zajištění výroby nechráněných tiskovin - opakované zadání
Tiskařské výrobky a související produkty
2
Ø3 in industry
Zajištění výroby tiskovin
Tiskařské a související služby
3
Ø4 in industry
Rámcová smlouva na nákup výstrojního vybavení
Zaměstnanecké oděvy, speciální pracovní oděvy a oděvní doplňky
2
Ø2 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

45%
average 68%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Creativedreams s.r.o.
1 104,000,000
Rebound, s.r.o.
2 23,466,666
Speed Press Plus a.s.
1 16,500,000
Dtp centrum, v.o.s.
1 10,666,666
Garamon, s.r.o.
1 10,666,666
Other suppliers 19 25,971,881

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

79%
average 78%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (3 from 0)
Nonprice competition 71% (5 from 7)
Division into lots 43% (3 from 7)
E-auction 0% (0 from 7)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 7)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

77%
average 56%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 191,271,886
Small scale tenders 0
Unregulated purchases 134,124,883
Total 325,396,768

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 61%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

61%
average 58%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 22%
Average requirements modifications count 0.71

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

91%
average 55%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 25)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 25)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 25)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 25)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 25)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 25)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

0%
average 32%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 0% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.00 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 0 tenders

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

62%
average 88%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 8% (2 from 25)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 25)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 25)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 25)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 25)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 25)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 24% (6 from 25)

Information provision

Has buyer answered our information request?   detailed info 

0%
average 56%

No response

Buyer did not reply within mandatory 15 days limit.