Government • 2015

Ministerstvo zdravotnictví

IČO 00024341

Buyer does not avoid following procurement law. Procurement journal misses vital information (prices, suppliers..).

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

76%
average 61%

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

60%
average 68%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
E.on Energie, a.s.
3 746,083,982
Centropol Energy, a.s.
2 391,351,691
Lumius, spol. s r.o.
2 186,368,200
C System Cz a.s.
72 122,075,685
Ep Energy Trading, a.s.
1 77,522,689
Other suppliers 125 335,925,907

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

76%
average 78%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 0)
Nonprice competition 7% (3 from 43)
Division into lots 5% (2 from 43)
E-auction 5% (2 from 43)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 43)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

97%
average 56%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 1,866,474,251
Small scale tenders 0
Unregulated purchases 127,420,866
Total 1,993,895,117

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

25%
average 61%

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

65%
average 58%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 17%
Cancelled contracts 16%
Average requirements modifications count 0.17

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

16%
average 55%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 5% (11 from 205)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 205)
Missing buyer ID 24% (50 from 205)
Missing call for tenders 3% (7 from 205)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 205)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 205)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

18%
average 32%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 20% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.47 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 0 tenders

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

87%
average 88%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 205)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 205)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 205)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 205)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 205)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 205)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 32% (66 from 205)

Information provision

Has buyer answered our information request?   detailed info 

100%
average 56%

Full disclosure

Buyer responded within 15 days legal limit.