State-owned enterprises • 2022 • past ranking

Letiště Praha, a. s.

IČO 28244532

Applicants are discouraged by frequent competition modifications and cancellations. The competition for contracts is low.

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

13%
average 47%

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

97%
average 83%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Lagardere Duty Free, s.r.o.
2 4,512,647,919
Vanderlande Industries B.V.
1 1,509,348,192
Lagardere Travel Retail, a.s.
5 570,430,823
Skanska a.s.
6 547,890,696
EUROVIA CS, a.s.
2 517,302,555
Other suppliers 451 4,047,235,580

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

63%
average 37%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 6% (3 from 53)
Nonprice competition 15% (14 from 91)
Division into lots 20% (18 from 91)
E-auction and DPS 68% (62 from 91)
Innovative procedure 1% (1 from 91)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

93%
average 76%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Rekonstrukce třídírny zavazadel v Terminálu 1 a 2 a výměna přístrojů EDS
Contract modification
1,509,348,192 44,402,436 (+3%)
Pojezdová dráha TWY R a odbavovací stání OP Jih
Contract modification
834,900,000 18,646,429 (+3%)
Rekonstrukce TWY B1 a B2
Contract modification
208,900,000 16,657,253 (+8%)
Prague Airport Passenger Terminal – Design Study
Contract modification
17,919,324 5,683,846 (+32%)
Nová retenční nádrž na ČOV + ČKV Sever
Contract modification
274,000,000 4,748,878 (+2%)

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

25%
average 60%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 8%
Cancelled contracts 28%
Average requirements modifications count 0.82
Average decision length 141.75 days

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

82%
average 96%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 28% (27 from 97)
Procedure type not published 5% (5 from 97)
Missing buyer ID 10% (10 from 97)
Missing call for tenders 1% (1 from 97)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 97)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 97)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

60%
average 44%
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 77% (zakázek z 78 ve Věstníku)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.92 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 78 tenders under the law)
0 - 250k Kč 41 zakázek
250k - 500k Kč 32 zakázek
500k - 1m Kč 55 zakázek
more than 1mil Kč 262 zakázek

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

91%
average 91%
There is insufficient data for score calculation. The indicator is not included in the evaluation and it is going to be taken into account next year.