Buyer does not avoid following procurement law. Uncompetitive procedures are overused.
Is the level of competition satisfactory? detailed info
Largest contracts Industry |
Bids |
---|---|
Výběr provozovatele vodohospodářské infrastruktury ve městě Dobruška a jeho okolí
Buyer profile data - no industry specification |
1
Ø2 in industry |
Sportovní hala v Dobrušce, ulice Pulická
Construction work |
13
Ø4 in industry |
17 BJ – Fr. Kupky, Dobruška
Construction work |
5
Ø4 in industry |
Stavební úpravy Městského úřadu v Dobrušce
Construction work for houses |
5
Ø4 in industry |
Svoz směsného a tříděného komunálního odpadu na území města Dobrušky
Refuse and waste related services |
1
Ø1 in industry |
Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms? detailed info
Largest suppliers | Contracts count | Contracts volume Kč |
---|---|---|
AQUA SERVIS, a.s. |
2 | 149,487,506 |
PS BRNO, s.r.o. |
1 | 79,453,059 |
STATING s.r.o. |
1 | 26,399,837 |
KERSON spol. s r.o. |
3 | 20,877,668 |
Marius Pedersen a.s. |
2 | 14,143,448 |
Other suppliers | 25 | 301,662,110 |
Supplier | Contracts count | Contracts volume (Kč) |
---|---|---|
AQUA SERVIS, a.s. |
2 | 149,487,506 |
PS BRNO, s.r.o. |
1 | 79,453,059 |
STATING s.r.o. |
1 | 26,399,837 |
KERSON spol. s r.o. |
3 | 20,877,668 |
Marius Pedersen a.s. |
2 | 14,143,448 |
STAVITELSTVÍ DS s.r.o. |
3 | 4,989,908 |
APCO technex, s.r.o. |
2 | 4,518,078 |
SPORTOVNÍ PODLAHY ZLÍN, s.r.o. |
1 | 4,007,267 |
CENTROPOL ENERGY, a.s. |
1 | 2,908,510 |
XC tech s.r.o. |
2 | 2,581,006 |
VODNÍ ZDROJE, a.s. |
1 | 2,313,410 |
MADOS MT s.r.o. |
2 | 1,957,062 |
CODE spol. s r.o. |
1 | 1,890,000 |
RP výtahy s.r.o. |
1 | 1,543,156 |
TO-PI-TO Czech s.r.o. |
1 | 1,214,697 |
ZHT Group s.r.o. |
1 | 917,355 |
D A B O N A s.r.o. |
1 | 766,000 |
AGRICO, s.r.o. |
1 | 760,000 |
KXN CZ, s.r.o. |
2 | 632,470 |
MIBAG sanace spol. s r.o. |
1 | 535,741 |
GARRET - CZ, spol. s r.o. |
1 | 506,355 |
Jiří Bašek - B & B GASTRO |
1 | 502,486 |
Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools? detailed info
Tool | Contracts count |
---|---|
Extended deadlines | 33% (1 from 3) |
Nonprice competition | 17% (1 from 6) |
Division into lots | 0% (0 from 6) |
E-auction | 0% (0 from 6) |
Innovative procedure | 0% (0 from 6) |
What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law? detailed info
Purchases | Volume (Kč) |
---|---|
Public procurement | 160,978,974 |
Small scale tenders | 171,651,971 |
Unregulated purchases | 110,658,768 |
Total | 443,289,713 |
Budget item | Objem prostredku Kč |
---|---|
Durable property purchases | 237,480,751 |
Material consumption | 31,628,448 |
Energy consumption | 35,179,065 |
Other consumption | 0 |
Sold goods | 713,071 |
Activation of durable property | 0 |
Activation of consumable property | 0 |
Change of stock | 0 |
Maintenance and repairs | 43,532,808 |
Travel costs | 704,164 |
Representation costs | 1,458,036 |
In-house services | 0 |
Other services | 77,282,275 |
Small long-term property costs | 10,138,694 |
Other costs | 5,172,401 |
Did buyer violate law significantly? detailed info
How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures? detailed info
Contract Reason for negotiated procedure without publication |
Original contract (Kč) | Contract modification / NPWP (Kč) |
---|---|---|
Sportovní hala v Dobrušce, ulice Pulická Contract modification |
79,453,059 | 6,500,439 (+9%) |
17 BJ – Fr. Kupky, Dobruška Contract modification |
26,399,837 | 2,584,311 (+10%) |
Stavební úpravy Městského úřadu v Dobrušce Contract modification |
18,224,699 | 1,292,356 (+8%) |
Contract Reason for negotiated procedure without publication |
Original contract (Kč) | Contract modification / NPWP (Kč) |
---|---|---|
Sportovní hala v Dobrušce, ulice Pulická Contract modification |
79,453,059 | 6,500,439 (+9%) |
17 BJ – Fr. Kupky, Dobruška Contract modification |
26,399,837 | 2,584,311 (+10%) |
Stavební úpravy Městského úřadu v Dobrušce Contract modification |
18,224,699 | 1,292,356 (+8%) |
Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications? detailed info
Does buyer publish vital data in official journal? detailed info
Type of flaw | Contracts count |
---|---|
Bidders count not published | 0% (0 from 7) |
Procedure type not published | 0% (0 from 7) |
Missing buyer ID | 0% (0 from 7) |
Missing call for tenders | 14% (1 from 7) |
Missing winning price | 0% (0 from 7) |
Contract modification by more than 50 % | 0% (0 from 7) |
Contract | Type of flaw |
---|---|
Svoz směsného a tříděného komunálního a jemu podobného odpadu na území města Dobrušky | Missing call for tenders |
Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements? detailed info
Check | Result | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? | 86% (contracts) | ||||||||||||
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? | 1.43 (average mistakes per contract) | ||||||||||||
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 7 tenders under the law) |
|
Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally? detailed info
Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.