Small cities • 2022 • past ranking

Město Semily

IČO 00276111

Applicants are discouraged by frequent competition modifications and cancellations. Small number of firms does not recieve majority of contracts.

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

average 51%
Largest contracts
Novostavba mateřské školy
Construction work for buildings relating to education and research
Ø4 in industry
Most Jatecká
Bridge construction work
Ø4 in industry
Rekonstrukce objektu Komenského nám. 146, Semily
Construction work
Ø4 in industry
Regenerace sídliště Jižní-Luční, Semily, I. etapa
Construction work
Ø4 in industry
RPS Řeky - V.etapa
Excavating and earthmoving work
Ø4 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
MBQ s.r.o.
1 41,088,201
BAK stavební společnost, a.s.
1 41,088,201
1 29,840,919
D-BAU s.r.o.
1 18,856,702
SaM silnice a mosty a.s.
2 12,998,172
Other suppliers 17 78,541,521

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

average 27%

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

average 68%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 186,380,009
Small scale tenders 9,287,018
Unregulated purchases 373,822,359
Total 569,489,385

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

average 87%
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Rekonstrukce objektu Komenského nám. 146, Semily
Contract modification
18,856,702 903,174 (+5%)

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

average 60%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 38%
Average requirements modifications count 1.13
Average decision length 45.75 days

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

average 98%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 19)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 19)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 19)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 19)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 19)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 19)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

average 49%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 94% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.50 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 18 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 3 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

average 81%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.