Small cities • 2022 • past ranking

Město Telč

IČO 00286745

Small number of firms recieve most of contracts. There are not many contract extensions and ammendments.

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

50%
average 51%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Revitalizace sídliště Jana Žižky v Telči – II. a III. etapa
Construction work for highways, roads
4
Ø5 in industry
Revitalizace sídliště Jana Žižky v Telči - II. a III. etapa
Buyer profile data - no industry specification
4
Ø2 in industry
Revitalizace památek v historickém centru města Telče, dílčí část: obnova domu č.p. 66
Construction work for buildings relating to leisure, sports, culture, lodging and restaurants
5
Ø4 in industry
Revitalizace sídliště Jana Žižky v Telči – I. etapa
Construction work for highways, roads
2
Ø5 in industry
Revitalizace památek v historickém centru města Telče, dílčí část: rekonstrukce radnice
Construction work for multi-dwelling buildings and individual houses
5
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

66%
average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Vlastimil Zelený
2 67,791,170
SATES ČECHY s.r.o.
4 53,895,209
STATUS stavební a.s.
2 35,258,696
STARKON a.s.
1 25,898,934
Pozemní stavby Telč s.r.o.
2 14,314,875
Other suppliers 16 188,432,514

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

69%
average 68%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 233,428,596
Small scale tenders 47,071,778
Unregulated purchases 303,622,175
Total 584,122,549

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

96%
average 87%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Revitalizace památek v historickém centru města Telče, dílčí část: rekonstrukce radnice
Contract modification
23,433,442 1,193,324 (+6%)
Zvýšení kapacity MŠ Komenského Telč (část stavba)
Contract modification
4,949,474 728,293 (+15%)

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

60%
average 60%
Average values displayed

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 98%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 16)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 16)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 16)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 16)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 16)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 16)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

50%
average 49%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 100% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.31 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 16 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 1 tender
1000K+ 4 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

80%
average 81%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.