Small cities • 2022 • past ranking

Město Telč

IČO 00286745

Small number of firms recieve most of contracts. There are not many contract extensions and ammendments.

Show average values  
50%
Bidder participation
66%
Winner concentration
20%
Pro-competitive tools
69%
Public procurement share on total purchases
100%
Legal misconduct
96%
Competitive contracting
60%
Consistent conduct
100%
Journal data quality
50%
Buyer profile data quality
80%
Supplier feedback

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

50%
average 51%
Largest contracts
Industry 		Bids
Revitalizace sídliště Jana Žižky v Telči – II. a III. etapa
Construction work for highways, roads
4
Ø5 in industry
Revitalizace sídliště Jana Žižky v Telči - II. a III. etapa
Buyer profile data - no industry specification
4
Ø2 in industry
Revitalizace památek v historickém centru města Telče, dílčí část: obnova domu č.p. 66
Construction work for buildings relating to leisure, sports, culture, lodging and restaurants
5
Ø4 in industry
Revitalizace sídliště Jana Žižky v Telči – I. etapa
Construction work for highways, roads
2
Ø5 in industry
Revitalizace památek v historickém centru města Telče, dílčí část: rekonstrukce radnice
Construction work for multi-dwelling buildings and individual houses
5
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

66%
average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Vlastimil Zelený
 2 67,791,170
SATES ČECHY s.r.o.
 4 53,895,209
STATUS stavební a.s.
 2 35,258,696
STARKON a.s.
 1 25,898,934
Pozemní stavby Telč s.r.o.
 2 14,314,875
Other suppliers 16 188,432,514

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

69%
average 68%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 233,428,596
Small scale tenders 47,071,778
Unregulated purchases 303,622,175
Total 584,122,549

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

96%
average 87%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication 		Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Revitalizace památek v historickém centru města Telče, dílčí část: rekonstrukce radnice
Contract modification 		23,433,442 1,193,324 (+6%)
Zvýšení kapacity MŠ Komenského Telč (část stavba)
Contract modification 		4,949,474 728,293 (+15%)

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

60%
average 60%
Average values displayed

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 98%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 16)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 16)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 16)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 16)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 16)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 16)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

50%
average 49%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 100% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.31 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 16 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 1 tender
1000K+ 4 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

80%
average 81%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.