Government • 2015

Koordinační středisko pro resortní zdravotnické informační systémy

IČO 71376500

Good buyer. Enough firms are competing for contracts. Purchases are made in legal regime, there is no tendency to portion contracts.

17.
ranking
70%
zIndex

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

88%
average 61%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Vytvoření a implementace základu jednotné technologické platformy včetně identity managementu, platformy pro vytěžování dat a napojení na základní registry veřejné správy
Zdravotnické informační systémy
3
Ø1 in industry
Poskytování služeb Kompetenčního centra ICT
Zdravotnické informační systémy
3
Ø1 in industry
Aplikační podpora
Zdravotnické informační systémy
1
Ø1 in industry
Systém řízení kvality a hodnocení bezpečnosti
Zdravotnické informační systémy
2
Ø1 in industry
Řízení projektového portfolia
Zdravotnické informační systémy
2
Ø1 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

53%
average 68%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Icz a.s.
3 129,457,000
Skylab, spol. s r.o.
1 52,000,000
Siks a.s.
1 18,000,000
solit project, s.r.o.
1 17,800,000
Mhm computer a.s.
1 15,877,770
Other suppliers 6 43,543,401

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

65%
average 78%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 0)
Nonprice competition 25% (1 from 4)
Division into lots 75% (3 from 4)
E-auction 0% (0 from 4)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 4)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

82%
average 56%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 376,594,171
Small scale tenders 0
Unregulated purchases 188,054,234
Total 564,648,405

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

56%
average 61%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Aplikační podpora
Jediný dodavatel (právní důvody)
- 18,000,000
Kompetenční centrum ICT - Provozní systémy - část Spisová služba
Jediný dodavatel (právní důvody)
- 12,207,000
Kompetenční centrum ICT - Provozní systémy - část Ekonomický informační systém
Jediný dodavatel (právní důvody)
- 10,708,000
Kompetenční centrum ICT - Provozní systémy - část Personalistika a mzdy
Jediný dodavatel (právní důvody)
- 9,203,164

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

45%
average 58%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 10%
Cancelled contracts 14%
Average requirements modifications count 0.80

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

67%
average 55%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 13)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 13)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 13)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 13)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 13)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 13)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

51%
average 32%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 60% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.59 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 0 tenders

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

81%
average 88%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 13)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 13)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 13)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 13)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 13)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 13)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 46% (6 from 13)

Information provision

Has buyer answered our information request?   detailed info 

100%
average 56%

Full disclosure

Buyer responded within 15 days legal limit.