Small cities • 2022 • past ranking

Město Kraslice

IČO 00259438

Buyer recieves unusually small ammount of bids. Buyer does not use tools to support competition.

Show average values  
21%
Bidder participation
96%
Winner concentration
0%
Pro-competitive tools
75%
Public procurement share on total purchases
100%
Legal misconduct
66%
Competitive contracting
60%
Consistent conduct
100%
Journal data quality
48%
Buyer profile data quality
80%
Supplier feedback

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

21%
average 51%
Largest contracts
Industry 		Bids
Vybudování zázemí sociálních služeb města Kraslice
Construction work
4
Ø4 in industry
Kraslice - kanalizace rozšíření IV. etapa
Construction work
3
Ø4 in industry
„Výstavba parkovacích ploch a propojovací komunikace ul. V Rovině, Kraslice“
Construction work
4
Ø4 in industry
Víceúčelové školní hřiště se zázemím v ul. Rybná, Kraslice
Construction work
2
Ø4 in industry
Komunikace a úhlová zeď – Kraslice
Buyer profile data - no industry specification
1
Ø2 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

96%
average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
SPECTEC Group s.r.o.
 1 12,745,265
PVKP stavební, s.r.o.
 1 9,864,255
Druhá severočeská stavební společnost spol. s r.o.
 1 7,968,357
VYSSPA Sports Technology s.r.o.
 1 6,909,909
KV Realinvest s.r.o.
 3 6,292,012
Other suppliers 12 21,976,299

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

0%
average 27%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 1)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 6)
Division into lots 0% (0 from 6)
E-auction 0% (0 from 6)
Innovative procedure 0% (0 from 6)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

75%
average 68%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 123,140,055
Small scale tenders 44,071,591
Unregulated purchases 131,574,215
Total 298,785,861

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

66%
average 87%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication 		Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Kraslice - kanalizace rozšíření IV. etapa
Contract modification 		9,864,255 1,789,494 (+19%)
Technické řešení bezpečnosti ZŠ a MŠ města Kraslice - III. etapa
Outside directive scope 		- 1,392,998
„Výstavba parkovacích ploch a propojovací komunikace ul. V Rovině, Kraslice“
Contract modification 		7,968,357 970,661 (+13%)

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

60%
average 60%
Average values displayed

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 98%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 8)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 8)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 8)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 8)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 8)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 8)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

48%
average 49%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 75% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.63 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 8 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 3 tenders
500K-1000K 4 tenders
1000K+ 5 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

80%
average 81%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.