Small cities • 2022 • past ranking

Město Kraslice

IČO 00259438

Buyer recieves unusually small ammount of bids. Buyer does not use tools to support competition.

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

21%
average 51%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Vybudování zázemí sociálních služeb města Kraslice
Construction work
4
Ø4 in industry
Kraslice - kanalizace rozšíření IV. etapa
Construction work
3
Ø4 in industry
„Výstavba parkovacích ploch a propojovací komunikace ul. V Rovině, Kraslice“
Construction work
4
Ø4 in industry
Víceúčelové školní hřiště se zázemím v ul. Rybná, Kraslice
Construction work
2
Ø4 in industry
Komunikace a úhlová zeď – Kraslice
Buyer profile data - no industry specification
1
Ø2 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

96%
average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
SPECTEC Group s.r.o.
1 12,745,265
PVKP stavební, s.r.o.
1 9,864,255
Druhá severočeská stavební společnost spol. s r.o.
1 7,968,357
VYSSPA Sports Technology s.r.o.
1 6,909,909
KV Realinvest s.r.o.
3 6,292,012
Other suppliers 12 21,976,299

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

0%
average 27%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 1)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 6)
Division into lots 0% (0 from 6)
E-auction 0% (0 from 6)
Innovative procedure 0% (0 from 6)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

75%
average 68%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 123,140,055
Small scale tenders 44,071,591
Unregulated purchases 131,574,215
Total 298,785,861

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

66%
average 87%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Kraslice - kanalizace rozšíření IV. etapa
Contract modification
9,864,255 1,789,494 (+19%)
Technické řešení bezpečnosti ZŠ a MŠ města Kraslice - III. etapa
Outside directive scope
- 1,392,998
„Výstavba parkovacích ploch a propojovací komunikace ul. V Rovině, Kraslice“
Contract modification
7,968,357 970,661 (+13%)

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

60%
average 60%
Average values displayed

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 98%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 8)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 8)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 8)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 8)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 8)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 8)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

48%
average 49%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 75% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.63 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 8 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 3 tenders
500K-1000K 4 tenders
1000K+ 5 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

80%
average 81%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.