Government • 2015

Krajské ředitelství policie Plzeňského kraje

IČO 75151529

Lot of money goes into historical contracts and unregulated purchases. Calls for tenders are often modified or cancelled.

Show average values  
39%
Bidder participation
63%
Winner concentration
79%
Pro-competitive tools
28%
Public procurement share on total purchases
100%
Legal misconduct
61%
Competitive contracting
33%
Consistent conduct
36%
Journal data quality
28%
Buyer profile data quality
89%
Supplier rating
0%
Information provision

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

39%
average 61%
Largest contracts
Industry 		Bids
KKCII. - KŘP ZČK
Stavební práce
3
Ø5 in industry
Stavební úpravy objektu OOP Kaznějov
Rekonstrukce budov
10
Ø5 in industry
Poskytování služeb elektronických komunikací
Telekomunikační služby
1
Ø2 in industry
Chemický a spotřební materiál
Chemické výrobky
Not disclosed
Ø2 in industry
Odvoz a odstranění tuhého komunálního a separovaného odpadu pro roky 2014-2015 z objektů KŘP -P
Služby související s likvidací odpadů a odpady
3
Ø3 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

63%
average 68%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Silba-elstav s.r.o.
 4 20,811,759
Ave Cz odpadové hospodářství s.r.o.
 6 10,326,272
Západočeské komunální služby a.s.
 5 7,119,118
Miras - stavitelství a sanace s.r.o.
 1 6,432,611
Life Technologies Czech Republic s.r.o.
 2 4,881,423
Other suppliers 6 7,904,386

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

79%
average 78%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 0)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 4)
Division into lots 100% (4 from 4)
E-auction 0% (0 from 4)
Innovative procedure 0% ( from 4)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

28%
average 56%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 58,505,277
Small scale tenders 0
Unregulated purchases 673,660,999
Total 732,166,276

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

61%
average 61%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication 		Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Poskytování služeb elektronických komunikací
Not disclosed 		- 4,801,516
Nákup chemikálií pro pracoviště genetiky OKTE
Not disclosed 		- 1,681,423
Nákup chemikálií pro pracoviště genetiky OKTE
Not disclosed 		- 385,274

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

33%
average 58%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 17%
Cancelled contracts 17%
Average requirements modifications count 0

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

36%
average 55%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 17% (4 from 24)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 24)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 24)
Missing call for tenders 54% (13 from 24)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 24)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 24)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

28%
average 32%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 29% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.15 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 0 tenders

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

89%
average 88%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 24)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 4% (1 from 24)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 0% (0 from 24)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 24)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 24)
Supplier donating to political party 0% (0 from 24)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 25% (6 from 24)

Information provision

Has buyer answered our information request?   detailed info 

0%
average 56%

No response

Buyer did not reply within mandatory 15 days limit.