Small cities • 2022 • past ranking

Město Lipník nad Bečvou

IČO 00301493

Large volume of money is spent without open competition. Considerable volume of contracts goes only to few firms.

Show average values  
59%
Bidder participation
63%
Winner concentration
20%
Pro-competitive tools
58%
Public procurement share on total purchases
100%
Legal misconduct
54%
Competitive contracting
60%
Consistent conduct
100%
Journal data quality
38%
Buyer profile data quality
80%
Supplier feedback

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

59%
average 51%
Largest contracts
Industry 		Bids
II/437 Lipník nad Bečvou – hranice Zlínského kraje
Construction work for highways, roads
4
Ø5 in industry
Vybudování infrastruktury lokality Chmelnice - I. etapa
Construction work
17
Ø4 in industry
Oprava povrchů místních komunikací v Lipníku nad Bečvou - ulice Na Zelince
Construction work
7
Ø4 in industry
Oprava povrchů komunikací a chodníku ul. Bohuslávská (I. etapa a II. etapa)
Construction work
7
Ø4 in industry
Lipník nad Bečvou - door to door systém sběru a svozu odpadů - Lipník nad Bečvou - door to door systém sběru a svozu odpadů - část I nádoby a VOK
Refuse skips
2
Ø2 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

63%
average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
STRABAG a.s.
 2 127,607,854
COLAS CZ, a.s.
 2 38,639,783
ELKOPLAST CZ, s.r.o.
 1 3,536,280
INISOFT s.r.o.
 1 1,880,489
PORR a.s.
 1 1,599,690

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

20%
average 27%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 1)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 5)
Division into lots 20% (1 from 5)
E-auction and DPS 0% (0 from 5)
Innovative procedure 0% (0 from 5)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

58%
average 68%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 129,018,654
Small scale tenders 1,599,690
Unregulated purchases 252,969,591
Total 383,587,934

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

54%
average 87%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication 		Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
II/437 Lipník nad Bečvou – hranice Zlínského kraje
Contract modification 		123,117,336 24,226,257 (+20%)

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

60%
average 60%
Average values displayed

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 98%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 5)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 5)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 5)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 5)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 5)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 5)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

38%
average 49%
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 80% (zakázek z 5 ve Věstníku)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.40 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 5 tenders under the law)
0 - 250k Kč 0 zakázek
250k - 500k Kč 0 zakázek
500k - 1m Kč 0 zakázek
more than 1mil Kč 1 zakázka

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

80%
average 81%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.