Small cities • 2022 • past ranking

Město Lipník nad Bečvou

IČO 00301493

Large volume of money is spent without open competition. Considerable volume of contracts goes only to few firms.

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

average 51%

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
2 127,607,854
COLAS CZ, a.s.
2 38,639,783
1 3,536,280
INISOFT s.r.o.
1 1,880,489
PORR a.s.
1 1,599,690

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

average 27%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 1)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 5)
Division into lots 20% (1 from 5)
E-auction 0% (0 from 5)
Innovative procedure 0% (0 from 5)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

average 68%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 129,018,654
Small scale tenders 1,599,690
Unregulated purchases 252,969,591
Total 383,587,934

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

average 87%
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
II/437 Lipník nad Bečvou – hranice Zlínského kraje
Contract modification
123,117,336 24,226,257 (+20%)

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

average 60%
Average values displayed

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

average 98%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 5)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 5)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 5)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 5)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 5)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 5)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

average 49%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 80% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.40 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 5 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 1 tender

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

average 81%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.