Regions • 2022 • past ranking

Plzeňský kraj

IČO 70890366

Procurement journal misses vital information (prices, suppliers..). There are not many contract extensions and ammendments.

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

average 46%

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

average 82%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
2 2,855,772,844
GW Train Regio a.s.
1 2,800,000,000
České dráhy, a.s.
1 216,206,000
GEOREAL spol. s r.o.
7 103,294,133
AZIMUT CZ s.r.o.
4 76,123,129
Other suppliers 140 6,475,286,601

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

average 46%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 17% (4 from 24)
Nonprice competition 38% (16 from 42)
Division into lots 14% (6 from 42)
E-auction 12% (5 from 42)
Innovative procedure 0% (0 from 42)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

average 94%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 6,624,697,556
Small scale tenders 353,416,135
Unregulated purchases 0
Total 3,593,279,646

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

average 63%
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Rozvoj IDP (3. etapa) – Provozování odbavovacích systémů v Plzeňském kraji
Authorship rights
- 22,692,352
Rozšíření komplexní služby na nabíjení Plzeňské karty prostřednictvím bankomatů na území Plzeňského kraje
Technical exclusivity
- 5,650,000

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

average 59%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 15%
Average requirements modifications count 0.40
Average decision length 77.15 days

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

average 94%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 45)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 45)
Missing buyer ID 2% (1 from 45)
Missing call for tenders 7% (3 from 45)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 45)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 45)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

average 60%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 82% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.95 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 44 tenders under the law)
0-250K 10 tenders
250K-500K 20 tenders
500K-1000K 33 tenders
1000K+ 27 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

average 84%

Buyer did receive excellent feedback from its tender participants.