State-owned enterprises • 2022 • past ranking

Dopravní podnik hl.m. Prahy ,akciová společnost

IČO 00005886

Calls for tenders are often modified or cancelled. Data on buyer profile have relatively good quality.

25.
ranking
71%
Zindex
Show average values  
47%
Bidder participation
91%
Winner concentration
48%
Pro-competitive tools
100%
Legal misconduct
85%
Competitive contracting
28%
Consistent conduct
97%
Journal data quality
75%
Buyer profile data quality
91%
Supplier feedback

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

47%
average 47%
Largest contracts
Industry 		Bids
Výstavba trasy I.D metra v Praze – úsek Pankrác – Depo Písnice, Doplňkový geologický průzkum úseku ID1a Úsek PAD4
Building demolition and wrecking work and earthmoving work
4
Ø4 in industry
Výstavba trasy I.D metra v Praze – úsek Pankrác – Depo Písnice Doplňkový geologický průzkum úseku ID1a Úsek VO-OL
Building demolition and wrecking work and earthmoving work
3
Ø4 in industry
Nákup 20 ks autobusů kategorie Kb+
Public-service buses
0
Ø1 in industry
Pronájem velkokapacitních autobusů
Low-floor buses
0
Ø1 in industry
Modernizace vzduchotechnických zařízení vybraných stanic metra
Electrical installation work
3
Ø3 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

91%
average 83%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
SOR Libchavy spol. s r.o.
 2 1,036,332,230
HOCHTIEF CZ a.s.
 4 969,303,082
Metrostav a.s.
 4 862,706,367
METROPROJEKT Praha a.s.
 20 344,284,762
ŠKODA TRANSPORTATION a.s.
 129 326,945,765
Other suppliers 1,093 5,338,390,112

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

48%
average 37%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 13% (24 from 179)
Nonprice competition 9% (17 from 199)
Division into lots 25% (50 from 199)
E-auction and DPS 6% (12 from 199)
Innovative procedure 0% (0 from 199)

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

85%
average 76%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication 		Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Opravy tramvají 14T a 15T po nehodách
Technical exclusivity 		- 178,222,941
Opravy brzdových systémů tramvajových vozů 14T a 15 T
Authorship rights 		- 72,979,549
Projektová dokumentace pro akci „Rekonstrukce tramvajové trati Táboritská - Seifertova"
Outside directive scope 		- 8,700,000
Projektová dokumentace - "Tramvajová trať Muzeum"
Outside directive scope 		- 8,500,500
Tramvajová trať Kobylisy - Zdiby, PD
Contract modification 		36,842,850 5,839,600 (+16%)

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

28%
average 60%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 5%
Cancelled contracts 16%
Average requirements modifications count 1.97
Average decision length 164.59 days

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

97%
average 96%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 20% (47 from 234)
Procedure type not published 2% (4 from 234)
Missing buyer ID 3% (8 from 234)
Missing call for tenders 0% (1 from 234)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 234)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (1 from 234)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

75%
average 44%
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 96% (zakázek z 193 ve Věstníku)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.65 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 193 tenders under the law)
0 - 250k Kč 453 zakázek
250k - 500k Kč 112 zakázek
500k - 1m Kč 80 zakázek
more than 1mil Kč 163 zakázek

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

91%
average 91%
There is insufficient data for score calculation. The indicator is not included in the evaluation and it is going to be taken into account next year.