Small cities • 2022 • past ranking

Město Králův Dvůr

IČO 00509701

Applicants are discouraged by frequent competition modifications and cancellations. Small number of firms recieve most of contracts.

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

average 51%
Largest contracts
II/605 a III/2365 Beroun, rekonstrukce silnic - zbývající úsek
Construction work
Ø4 in industry
Králův Dvůr-obchvat-II. část
Construction work
Ø4 in industry
Novostavba bytového domu
Construction work
Ø4 in industry
Novostavba bytového domu
Buyer profile data - no industry specification
Ø2 in industry
Rekonstrukce lávky přes D5 v Králově Dvoře
Bridge renewal construction work
Ø4 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
3 152,778,832
Spektra PRO spol. s r.o.
5 33,651,919
Spektra, spol. s.r.o.
3 32,852,977
AVE CZ odpadové hospodářství s.r.o.
6 26,828,947
SMP CZ, a.s.
1 24,285,771
Other suppliers 48 299,560,773

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

average 68%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 267,454,194
Small scale tenders 71,811,862
Unregulated purchases 394,757,002
Total 734,023,058

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

average 87%
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Králův Dvůr-obchvat-II. část
Contract modification
31,226,121 1,267,951 (+5%)

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

average 60%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 25%
Average requirements modifications count 2.00
Average decision length 174.63 days

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

average 98%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 15)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 15)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 15)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 15)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 15)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 15)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

average 49%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 73% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.80 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 15 tenders under the law)
0-250K 1 tender
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 26 tenders
1000K+ 17 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

average 81%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.