Small cities • 2020 • past ranking

Město Chlumec nad Cidlinou

IČO 00268861

Good buyer. Buyer profile is in relatively good shape. The competition for contracts is high.

8.
ranking
77%
zIndex

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

65%
average 47%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
III/32736 Chlumec nad Cidlinou, ul. Palackého
Construction, foundation and surface works for highways, roads
3
Ø6 in industry
Svoz a nakládání s odpadem města Chlumce nad Cidlinou
Refuse collection services
2
Ø2 in industry
Oprava komunikace a chodníků 2018 v Chlumci nad Cidlinou
Construction work
5
Ø3 in industry
Celková oprava komunikace ulice Komenského v Chlumci nad Cidlinou
Buyer profile data - no industry specification
11
Ø2 in industry
ROZLUČKOVÁ SÍŇ
Buyer profile data - no industry specification
4
Ø2 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

91%
average 82%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
M-SILNICE a.s.
2 22,560,287
STRABAG a.s.
2 20,813,696
STAVTE, s.r.o.
2 14,865,839
Marius Pedersen a.s.
1 14,810,378
REKOM Nový Bydžov, a.s.
1 13,110,954
Other suppliers 31 59,678,604

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

40%
average 32%

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

68%
average 58%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 69,500,893
Small scale tenders 91,201,476
Unregulated purchases 182,127,011
Total 342,829,380

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 89%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

64%
average 64%
Average values displayed

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 96%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 10)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 10)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 10)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 10)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 10)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 10)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

69%
average 43%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 90% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.20 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 10 tenders under the law)
0-250K 1 tender
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 10 tenders
1000K+ 19 tenders